Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:45 AM
bawcerelli bawcerelli is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 16
Default limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

you guys limp this? is my fold too tight?

i usually fold this in ep because a risk of a raise. as it turned out, someone had AA but chose to limp.


Seat 1: gentleman55 (1500 in chips)
Seat 2: KingRat (1420 in chips)
Seat 3: BubbaKGB (3640 in chips)
Seat 5: LeftLV (1365 in chips)
Seat 6: steve q (1400 in chips)
Seat 7: pillows5 (1465 in chips)
Seat 8: Poket Genies (1450 in chips)
Seat 9: JTF10 (1260 in chips)
Poket Genies: posts small blind 15
JTF10: posts big blind 30
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to gentleman55 [Ac Tc]
gentleman55: folds
KingRat: calls 30
BubbaKGB: folds
LeftLV: folds
steve q: folds
pillows5: folds
Poket Genies: folds
JTF10: checks
*** FLOP *** [9c 8h 7c]
KingRat said, "flop was scary"
JTF10: bets 330
KingRat: raises 330 to 660
JTF10: raises 330 to 990
KingRat: raises 400 to 1390 and is all-in
JTF10: calls 240 and is all-in
*** TURN *** [9c 8h 7c] [5c]
*** RIVER *** [9c 8h 7c 5c] [Kd]
BubbaKGB said, "he either had low pockets or was slowbetting his AK"
*** SHOW DOWN ***
JTF10: shows [Ah Ad] (a pair of Aces)
KingRat: shows [Td 9d] (a pair of Nines)
JTF10 collected 2535 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2535 | Rake 0
Board [9c 8h 7c 5c Kd]
Seat 1: gentleman55 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: KingRat showed [Td 9d] and lost with a pair of Nines
Seat 3: BubbaKGB folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: LeftLV folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: steve q folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: pillows5 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: Poket Genies (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: JTF10 (big blind) showed [Ah Ad] and won (2535) with a pair of Aces
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2005, 04:06 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

Easiest fold I ever make.
Also, by showing us the outcome you make us result oriented as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2005, 04:28 AM
bawcerelli bawcerelli is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 16
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

do you limp this in mp or lp? i like to limp ATs - AQs ( in early levels - in late levels i'm pushing) to hit either the nut flush or nut straight draw (or a combo of both).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2005, 05:24 AM
HesseJam HesseJam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

Early rounds:

ATs: I fold in EP, might limp in MP if I think the table is more on the pf-passive side or might steal. LP, I mostly put in a standard raise and tend to fold on a standard re-raise pf.

AJs: I start stealing earlier (late MP).

AQs: I hate limping AQs at most levels. AQ is a value raise hand for me. First in I put in a standard 3-5 BB raise. After 1-2 limpers, I tend to play the same. I understand that the forum here is split on this issue. I occasionally limp with AQs at late levels if the situation is right to trigger all-ins.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2005, 05:55 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

Fold and stop being results oriented!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2005, 09:30 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

[ QUOTE ]
do you limp this in mp or lp? i like to limp ATs - AQs ( in early levels - in late levels i'm pushing) to hit either the nut flush or nut straight draw (or a combo of both).

[/ QUOTE ]

With a deep enough stack, I'll limp this from later positions sometimes, but I fold it a good bit, too. You need some money in the pot and a passive table to make it worth it, IMO. It's a good fold here.

Also, I doubt your guy limps his AA with two limpers in front of him, so you'd most likely end up folding this to his pre-flop raise, anyway. Then again, he was willing to make multiple raises on a flop where he ought to only be seeing JT (and so was his idiot opponent).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2005, 10:02 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

FWIW if the table is playing passively I limp this. I wouldn't in level 2 on party though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2005, 12:19 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

I fold this so fast.

Results oriented is bad also.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2005, 12:22 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW if the table is playing passively I limp this. I wouldn't in level 2 on party though.

[/ QUOTE ]

By the way, I fold ATo, and call A9s too. Again, only on passive tables on stars.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2005, 12:25 PM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: limp or results oriented? stars 25 turbo

Yes but we all know you're a LAG at heart [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.