Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2005, 02:01 AM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 71
Default Re: Who bats 9th?

[ QUOTE ]
ortiz, you're not trying to maximize his rbi total, but to maximize your teams run total. While Ortiz might lose some RBI, they'd surely be picked up by Manny.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure, but Manny would have just as many RBI if you bat him fourth and Ortiz third.

You are trying to maximize your teams runs by putting your players in a position where they can maximize thier production. Batting Ortiz second is not doing that. Ortiz is an RBI guy and should be put in as many RBI situations as possible. Same with Manny.

Nobody is saying to bat a weak hitter #2. What you want there is the best combination of average, speed, and on base ability. In the case of the '05 Red Sox, this would have been Bill Mueller, probably the teams fourth best hitter. The Red Sox were expecting Renteria to put up similar numbers to what Mueller actually put up, only with more speed. That's why he hit second most of the season.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2005, 02:31 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: Who bats 9th?

[ QUOTE ]
Sure, but Manny would have just as many RBI if you bat him fourth and Ortiz third.

[/ QUOTE ]

Except the #4 hitter often bats with no one out because of 1-2-3 innings in the first, and he also gets 20 more PA which translates into more RBI opportunities.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.