Could this be an always-profit Blackjack strategy?

[joshman1204]

but you would never leave the table a billion dollars richer because you would only leave +1 unit.

[cardcounter0]

No, you could never leave the table richer.

Infinite bank roll + 1 unit winnings = Infinite bank roll.
[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[yvesaint]

OH YES THAT WORKS YOURE A GENIUS NO ONE HAS EVER THOUGHT ABOUT THIS SINCE GAMBLING EVER STARTED

BUT NOW WE ALL HAVE YOUR SECRET GOOD JOB YOU SHOULD KEEP YOUR GENIUS IDEAS TO YOURSELF

[mosta]

[ QUOTE ]
OH YES THAT WORKS YOURE A GENIUS NO ONE HAS EVER THOUGHT ABOUT THIS SINCE GAMBLING EVER STARTED

BUT NOW WE ALL HAVE YOUR SECRET GOOD JOB YOU SHOULD KEEP YOUR GENIUS IDEAS TO YOURSELF

[/ QUOTE ]

give a kid a break. nah, let's discourage people from thinking about things on their own.

[mosta]

[ QUOTE ]
No it dosent because there is always the possiblity of an inifinite losing streak. It is an insanely small possibility but it is possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

so you think there's a difference between zero, and zero at the limit? go back to high school calculus.

however it is true that the EV is undefined, because you get really really big numbers multiplied by really really small numbers and it's an intractable calculation.

[tonypaladino]

[EliteNinja]

[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

Brilliant.

Perhaps you should play Roulette instead!! (lawl)

[scalf]

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] nah...keno

that's the intellectual's game..

gl

[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[malorum]

Posts like this always reassure me that there will be money to be made in poker for some time to come, no matter how many books they publish.