|
|
|
|
#1
12-14-2005, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable. [/ QUOTE ] Not really. Anyone good enough to pull it off moves up before they get even close to a big enough sample size to mean anything. 8ptbb/100 LONGTERM is very tough. [/ QUOTE ] A little bit off topic here. Is there any qualitative difference between 100 and higher limit? Lets assume someone has 8ptbb/100 at 100NL level, what's his expectaion at 200, 400? 
|
|
#2
12-14-2005, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable. [/ QUOTE ] Not really. Anyone good enough to pull it off moves up before they get even close to a big enough sample size to mean anything. 8ptbb/100 LONGTERM is very tough. [/ QUOTE ] A little bit off topic here. Is there any qualitative difference between 100 and higher limit? Lets assume someone has 8ptbb/100 at 100NL level, what's his expectaion at 200, 400? [/ QUOTE ] My winrate at NL $100 and $200 is within .5 PTBB after 50k and 25k hands, respectively. My expectation is not to see an increase in my win rate as I move up. I would much rather try to maintain my current win rate. Maintaining your current NL$100 win rate at NL $400 means you are making 4 times your NL $100 earn. That's much more realistic goal as to what is attainable than shooting for a magic number.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
