Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-11-2005, 02:04 PM
beekeeper beekeeper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 155
Default \"value to learning to beat super-loose games\"

[ QUOTE ]

I happen to believe that there is value to learning to beat super-loose games. It teaches discipline and playing correctly while getting sucked out on. [ QUOTE ]



In response to AKQJ10's response to a Pyschology post.


I agree. I'm a beginner, too, but it seems that most of the games I play in (home games, small stakes, NL, tournament format) are of this character. I've learned displine, better timing, how to use position, and to trust many of Sklansky's theories despite being sucked out on. More than anything, I've learned the truth in the maxim that it's about winning money vs winning pots.


If you play in these games, would you agree?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.