Sets vs. Continuous

Hendricks433 · #1 12-28-2005, 03:47 AM

I seem to get better results when I play in Sets. IDK maybe too small of a sample size.

#2 12-28-2005, 04:02 AM

I used to play sets of 4, after a while I switched to continuous. It isn't much harder, if at all, and it increases your hourly rate a bit.

ZeroPointMachine · #3 12-28-2005, 04:27 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I used to play sets of 4, after a while I switched to continuous. It isn't much harder, if at all, and it increases your hourly rate a bit.

[/ QUOTE ]

But, because you eliminate the hassle of dealing with the lobby and playing tables at widely different levels, sets of 6 or 8 are just as easy to play as 4 continuous IMO and increase your hourly rate even more.

Mr_J · #4 12-28-2005, 04:39 AM

[ QUOTE ]
sets of 6 or 8 are just as easy to play as 4 continuous

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that 6 in sets is probally no harder than 4 continuous.

To the guy you replied to, going from 4 tabling sets to continuous is easier (ie you suffer less of an roi drop, less inefficiency etc) than doing the same for 8+ tables.