Would you protest a trade if you knew there was no collusion?

[scott8]

And thus were protesting because you thought the trade was unfair (and not to just try and screw another owner or something).

[wh1t3bread]

Yes, absolutely. But you will need to provide hard statistical facts that make your case.

[Aces McGee]

This is very dependent on the league rules. Our league rules state that no trade can be overturned unless collusion or indifference on the part of one party was evident.

-McGee

[UncleRemus]

This is one of my biggest pet peeves. The voting on this poll disgusts me. If people are going to be punished for being a good negotiator or taking advantage of a weaker team, why don't we have "REDO's" for when certain teams draft too well as well.

Unless it's clearly collusion, one should never veto. I've voted to veto only one trade in all my years of fantasy football, and it was only becuase a winless team was obviously giving up on his season.

[pokerdirty]

don't play in leagues with morons.

[fingokra]

like saying don't play poker with morons

[pokerdirty]

[ QUOTE ]
like saying don't play poker with morons

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly.

[YoureToast]

I agree (althought not as vehemently).

The answer is "no", and its not close.

[PITTM]

me and my friends have a yahoo private league and every trade that happens i vote against. regardless of the trade. maybe if the first place guy made a horrid trade i wouldnt vote against it, but why not vote against them all? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

rj

[Soul Daddy]

I like to berate those who make stupid trades and rally others to veto them, but I never veto them myself.