Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 09-06-2005, 01:32 PM
Komodo Komodo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 173
Default Re: A Less Obvious Martingale Fallacy

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar till:</font><hr />
The sim is flawed because you can't take accounting at any finite point, as per the OP. Martingaling works because a win is inevitable. In an infinite series, you will see all of the wins, and they will cancel out all of the losses and then some. The "then some" increases one by one into infinity.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is exactly here where many peoples thinking is flawed. The win isnt inevitable. In an infinite serie, the probability will be closer and closer to 100%, but never 100. The assumption that every martingaler will be able to complete his serie is matchematically impossible. It will be 99,99999999999999999999999999 etc etc but never 100%.
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:01 AM
ThinkQuick ThinkQuick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 97
Default Re: A Less Obvious Martingale Fallacy

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Your old bankroll was infinite.

[/ QUOTE ]

So why were you playing in the first place?


[/ QUOTE ]

Just funny again
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.