Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:21 PM
KramerTM KramerTM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 78
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33?

[/ QUOTE ]

As a percentage increase, the jump to the $55's is the smallest.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

Jump from 22 to 33 = 50% increase.
Jump from 33 to 55 = 66.6% increase.

22 and 33 are closer.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:21 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

Ok thats the help I needed [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I suspect that he's talking about something else, or maybe slyly referring to the fact that $33s run shorter and thus are closer in terms of $ wagered per hour.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:21 PM
lacky lacky is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

tell Mark I said he's an idiot if he doesn't make you do this on a time bases, as in amount won in so many hours. The great equalizer in the bet is the fact that the 33's are shorter.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:23 PM
skipperbob skipperbob is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33?

[/ QUOTE ]

As a percentage increase, the jump to the $55's is the smallest.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

Jump from 22 to 33 = 50% increase.
Jump from 33 to 55 = 66.6% increase.

22 and 33 are closer.

[/ QUOTE ]

This ought to be interesting [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:28 PM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33?

[/ QUOTE ]

As a percentage increase, the jump to the $55's is the smallest.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

Jump from 22 to 33 = 50% increase.
Jump from 33 to 55 = 66.6% increase.

22 and 33 are closer.

[/ QUOTE ]

Holy christ, guys. The $22's did not occur to us. Sorry. It's the smallest jump of all the limits we've played.

Irieguy
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:29 PM
SuitedSixes SuitedSixes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 220
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

In no particular order:

1) Nice avatar.
2) Zen made a bad bet (although it is widely believed that he is one of the best $33 players ever). My guess is that you will win and it has nothing to do with skill level. I would feel the same way about whomever was playing the $55s.
3) Stay off my tables.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:30 PM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

[ QUOTE ]
tell Mark I said he's an idiot if he doesn't make you do this on a time bases, as in amount won in so many hours. The great equalizer in the bet is the fact that the 33's are shorter.

Steve

[/ QUOTE ]

Not when Zen plays. If we both play a set, me the $55's and him the $33's, I'll finish first.

Irieguy

PS- spare obvious jokes about how much quicker SNGs are if you never make the money.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:35 PM
TheUsher TheUsher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 647
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

Come on man, where can I get some of this action. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] In the future, I'd really love to see if this were possible for you in the 215's and Zen playing 109's. That would make it VERY interesting to see if it's possible to make more playing 109's versus the much tougher 215's now. You guys gonna be 4 or 8 tabling btw?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:38 PM
KramerTM KramerTM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 78
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33?

[/ QUOTE ]

As a percentage increase, the jump to the $55's is the smallest.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

Jump from 22 to 33 = 50% increase.
Jump from 33 to 55 = 66.6% increase.

22 and 33 are closer.

[/ QUOTE ]

Holy christ, guys. The $22's did not occur to us. Sorry. It's the smallest jump of all the limits we've played.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

Best response ever! That's like a really rich guy trying to break a ten, but he doesn't have any fives. Finally, someone suggests he uses ones, and he goes "Wow, I didn't even think of those." [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Anyway, it was fun going back and forth. Keep us posted on the wager!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-02-2005, 05:52 PM
skipperbob skipperbob is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Pwning at a lower limit

[ QUOTE ]
Come on man, where can I get some of this action. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] In the future, I'd really love to see if this were possible for you in the 215's and Zen playing 109's. That would make it VERY interesting to see if it's possible to make more playing 109's versus the much tougher 215's now. You guys gonna be 4 or 8 tabling btw?

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait 'till next week Usher...They're going to the L.V. Zoo to bet on which monkey can auto-eroticize theyownself to orgasm first....Then it will be a parlay to which group of monkeys can establish a "dynasty" that will win the Superbowl four times in the next three years [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.