New Party Games (Stats)

[krishanleong]

30/60 - Based on 162K datamined hands.
VP$IP ---------- 25.50
SF% ----------- 26.1
PFR ------------ 11.10
Avg. Pot ------- 7.20 BB
Rake as % ----- .68%
Rake as BB/100- (.46)

20/40 - Based on 52K datamined hands.
VP$IP --------- 27.02
ASF ----------- 28.8
PFR ----------- 10.05
Avg. Pot ------- 7.16 BB
Rake as % ----- 1%
Rake as BB/100- (.69)

15/30 - Based on 176K datamined hands.
VP$IP --------- 26.86
ASF ----------- 28.54
PFR ----------- 9.96
Avg. Pot ------- 7.08 BB
Rake as % ----- 1.3%
Rake as BB/100- (.89)

Krishan

[La Brujita]

This is interesting. Thanks for posting it.

[Nigel]

Thanks Krishan, good stuff.

Nigel

[flub]

Surprise surprise the higher games are tougher and pay a smaller % in rake.

[mike l.]

"the higher games are tougher"

not significantly so, at least from these stats. i read the point of the post to be that all 3 games are essentially the same at least in general terms.

[elindauer]

[ QUOTE ]
Surprise surprise the higher games are tougher and pay a smaller % in rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you even look at the stats?

[Turning Stone Pro]

interesting. ty.

TSP

[Senor Choppy]

[ QUOTE ]
Surprise surprise the higher games are tougher and pay a smaller % in rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you spent more than 15 seconds looking at the original post, you'd see that despite a tighter blind structure, the 20/40 has more people seeing flops. Given the fact that it's the 2nd highest limit on Party, which conventional wisdom seems to say plays the toughest, it's fairly surprising, IMO.

If I were a 15/30 player, I'd seriously consider moving up after seeing this.