Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-07-2005, 01:30 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Big Draw faces Major Aggression

Please help me with the logic of whether to call this...

Villain 1 Stats: 102 hands 24 / 5
Villain 2 Stats: 195 hands 34 / 7

Scenario 1: My stack is $150
Scenario 2: My stack is $500
Scenario 3: My stack covers everyone

$400 NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, September 07

Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: Villain 2 ( $1197.50 )
Seat 3: axisbal ( $562.10 )
Seat 4: ninjadraw ( $191.10 )
Seat 5: hartvey1 ( $1350.75 )
Seat 6: VILLAIN 1 ( $480 )
Seat 2: HERO ( $150.40)
VILLAIN 1 posts small blind [$2].
Villain 2 posts big blind [$4].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ Jc Kc ]
HERO calls [$4].
axisbal raises [$8].
ninjadraw folds.
VILLAIN 1 calls [$6].
Villain 2 calls [$4].
HERO calls [$4].
** Dealing Flop ** [ Qc, 5d, 9c ]
VILLAIN 1 checks.
Villain 2 checks.
HERO bets [$30.40].
axisbal folds.
VILLAIN 1 raises [$150].
Villain 2 raises [$300].
Hero ??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-07-2005, 01:36 AM
firstyearclay firstyearclay is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10
Default Re: Big Draw faces Major Aggression

MATH GUYS STEP UP HERE!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-07-2005, 01:42 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Big Draw faces Major Aggression

I was ready to get it all in... But the second monster raise made me think this is clearly a set while the first all-in looks like nut flush draw... maybe Ac Tc or Ac Xc... but could just be a lower flush draw or an overpair... even if he doesn't have NUT flush draw, a simple flush draw takes 2 outs away from me...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:03 AM
LuvDemNutz LuvDemNutz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Big Draw faces Major Aggression

My gut says fold as you could be drawing to 3 outs.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:20 AM
MTBlue MTBlue is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 91
Default Re: Big Draw faces Major Aggression

I was villain 1 in this hand and had the nut flush draw and was actually just thinking over this hand. I'm not sure if villain two had a set b/c twice before I'd shown massive aggression and both times he'd come over the top big and I was forced to fold b/c both raises were isolation raises. It's a horrible spot for you and I think there are decent arguments for both a fold and a call (getting almost three to 1 on your money).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:45 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Big Draw faces Major Aggression

thanks MT -- glad I posted it...

what did you put him on? also, why bet $150 there? wouldn't something large but smaller than $150 isolate if he didn't have much??



to others, I did fold and so did Villain 1...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:51 AM
Lucky Lucky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 81
Default Re: Big Draw faces Major Aggression

fold in all three scenarios. You're up against a set/nut flush draw with these guys.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-07-2005, 11:25 AM
MTBlue MTBlue is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 91
Default Re: Big Draw faces Major Aggression

I like to use a slight overbet raise with a set here due to the amount of draws on the board and it keeps everything standard. I probably could have saved thirty bucks by raising less. Villain 2 probably had a set/ a crooked two pair or top pair with a random kicker b/c he was in the big blind and both him and axisbal had decided that my big raises meant weakness so when ever I raised I was catching alot of hell.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:08 PM
amulet amulet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 459
Default Re: No one answered the question?

no one really answered the question.

i am going to just round off all the numbers as you would over the game.

you have the second nut flush draw and an inside str8 draw including a one card str8 flush draw. let's assume for this response you did not know you were vs the nut flush draw (your first post).

your flush is 9 outs, which is 4 to 1 on the next card, 2 to 1 against if you see both cards. however, from the betting you think may be a set out, so lets remove 2 outs. that leaves you 7 outs. now we add 4 outs for the str8 draw, which is 11 to 1 on the next card, let's for simplicity say 5.5 to 1 against if you see the river. of those outs the str8 flush out is a real out, let's still call the other 3 probable. 7 plus 4 equals 11 outs twice.

everyone should know that the set is 7.6 to 1 to make his full or better on the next card, and 3.8 by the river.

all players know the 9 outs is 2 to 1 by the river, 4 to 1 on the next card and you have 11. next i would then remove an out or probability two because of the nut flush possibility (and if someone is drawing to a smaller flush, you also have fewer outs). this is not off set by your one perfect srt8 flush out. we are back to about 9 outs in a BEST case scenario. therefore, we are back to about your bringing then a 2 to 1 dog here if you see the river. how much more depends. i would figure that i was not 3 to 1 but somewhere in between (2.25 to 2.5 to 1 over the table). the rest is easy based on the number of chips in the pot and your stack.

math aside you need to add in what you know about the players, and the game.

if you want it done exactly with exact percentages, etc, just post a request. however, i prefer thinking as most could over the table.

facing the reraise vs the non nut flush and a possible set, if i respect the players i usually fold, and am happy to have lost only $36.4.

additionally if you think the games has a positive expectation expectation for you, i prefer playing with a full stack.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:31 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: No one answered the question?

the essence of my post was really about playing KING-high flush draws. Guess I should have said that.

Clearly, drawing to King-high flush is sub-optimal... but maybe not unprofitable... I have seen players at 2/4 often move in with nothing but flush draws and undercards. In this case, both opponents were playing solid poker so this was unlikely and thus an easier laydown.

The reason I don't play deep-stack is the mathematical edge I get by having enough to not allow others to draw but not so much that I have to lay down when I have significant pot equity. There are some other benefits too when maniacs just see my 45 BB stack and try to push me off my hand thinking I am less willing to put it in just because its an all-in. I think I get some extra action by these types just because I DON'T threaten their entire stack... It's like my smaller stack is taunting them and their compulsive nature wants to run me over...

Admittedly, vs good players -- there is no advantage except that I cannot be bluffed as well --- Although one plus is I do face less really tough river decisions because I often have good odds by the time I get to the river (if I don't get all-in on turn) -- I am not laying big implied odds. There are a few negatives but I find reduced variance to be a positive... I still win very significant pots when it gets multiway... and playing hands like AA is much much easier (get as close to all-in as I can, the faster the better)...

For example, in this hand I posted, with the nut flush... I can make a profitable call here getting 3-1 whereas if I am deeper (like Villain 1 here), I can't. I only folded because it was King-high flush draw.

If I make Villain 1's $150 bet here, I am all-in and don't have to give up the pot equity he did.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.