Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-20-2005, 05:37 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ---HU SNG Challenge Progress Report---

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Most of the SNG's I win are all in the first level.


[/ QUOTE ]

Is this true?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, for me too. Max. time has been 53 minutes but average time for me is around 11 minutes with more than 50% ending in level 1.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow... maybe I should switch to stars. The bodog structure is 10 hands per level, first level = 5/10, and 1k starting chips. It usually ends at 30/60 or 50/100.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-20-2005, 08:32 PM
astarck astarck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 55s
Posts: 470
Default Re: ---HU SNG Challenge Progress Report---

[ QUOTE ]
Wow... maybe I should switch to stars. The bodog structure is 10 hands per level, first level = 5/10, and 1k starting chips. It usually ends at 30/60 or 50/100.

[/ QUOTE ]

But I'm sure you're playing more than 1 hand per minute. So even though you are getting to a much higher blind level, the average time to completion isn't probably far off.

I'm not sure how many hands I'm playing in level 1, but it's WAY more than 10.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-20-2005, 08:57 PM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: ---HU SNG Challenge Progress Report---

Very interesting thread. If you don't mind, what buyins are you playing? I'm curious if it is mainly lower buyins that go so fast. Also, how many tables are you playing?

Well, I can't start until Irie's project is up to make sure I get in my 500 games.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-20-2005, 09:10 PM
gumpzilla gumpzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: ---HU SNG Challenge Progress Report---

The player archetype I've noticed that is pretty common in low-level HU SNGs on Stars is: loose preflop (will fold pretty rarely to PF action), folds to flop continuation bets when they whiff, will call down if they've caught basically anything. Against these opponents, I've generally been adopting the strategy of trying to see flops as cheaply as possible, so that when we both miss relatively small continuation bets take it down, and it gives me numerous chances to get top pair type holdings paid off by weaker hands.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-20-2005, 09:29 PM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: ---HU SNG Challenge Progress Report---

[ QUOTE ]
The player archetype I've noticed that is pretty common in low-level HU SNGs on Stars is: loose preflop (will fold pretty rarely to PF action), folds to flop continuation bets when they whiff, will call down if they've caught basically anything. Against these opponents, I've generally been adopting the strategy of trying to see flops as cheaply as possible, so that when we both miss relatively small continuation bets take it down, and it gives me numerous chances to get top pair type holdings paid off by weaker hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

So they must be bluffing a lot post flop?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-20-2005, 09:34 PM
gumpzilla gumpzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: ---HU SNG Challenge Progress Report---

[ QUOTE ]

So they must be bluffing a lot post flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

Occasionally, but not as much as you would think, in my experience (which is still quite limited in these games). It seems like a reaction to another stereotypical HU style of super over-aggressiveness, so maybe they enjoy enough success against the right people to make it worthwhile.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-20-2005, 09:39 PM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: ---HU SNG Challenge Progress Report---

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

So they must be bluffing a lot post flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

Occasionally, but not as much as you would think, in my experience (which is still quite limited in these games). It seems like a reaction to another stereotypical HU style of super over-aggressiveness, so maybe they enjoy enough success against the right people to make it worthwhile.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was thinking, if they are folding when they whiff, you aren't getting paid a lot when you hit, unless they bluff into you. If they are being passive preflop and weak post flop, it seems like raising preflop and stealing postflop would be good.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-20-2005, 09:44 PM
gumpzilla gumpzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: ---HU SNG Challenge Progress Report---

[ QUOTE ]

I was thinking, if they are folding when they whiff, you aren't getting paid a lot when you hit, unless they bluff into you. If they are being passive preflop and weak post flop, it seems like raising preflop and stealing postflop would be good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's a valid point. The thing is that they fold pretty rarely when the flop hits them at all, so taking stabs at it will pretty frequently miss, and it seems like on balance the effect would be to just effectively raise the blinds. I do still raise occasionally preflop, but a lot less than I might in other circumstances.

I should also note that I have not thought particularly deeply about these games and I'm quite possibly way off base. This is just what I've noticed so far.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.