|
|
#12
10-22-2005, 04:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Hello,Beer! FOLD! If u had him beat at this stage,
FOLDING is a small mistake. however , if he does have a set and u continue on,ur error would be MAJOR.
HappyPokering, SittingBull BTW,in my micro-limit games,I wouln't mind losing a few .25 just to see his hand. However,when ur playing at 15/30 or higher,FOLDING in this case is USUALLY ur BEST option. 
|
|
#13
10-22-2005, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Results..
I folded. Bartholow claims he didn't have it. Personally, i think he had quads. Sittingbull, when you read the opinions of Jeffage and Andy, do you still think that folding is the right play? One reason why I think I should have called is cause bart is an observant player who knows I usually limp with live 3 flushes. Therefore, he may have been making a move to pick up a decent pot on fifth. And, he also knows I border on weak-tightness sometimes. Thanks for everyone's thoughts.
|
|
#14
10-22-2005, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Results..
I think you are overthinking things. I raised with a live 3-flush with a couple of big cards in this hand. I wasn't trying to bully you or anything, I just wanted to raise for the usual reasons (though on pacific you don't thin players much, but you do build nice pots). Then I hit another ace and that's an automatic bet. It's true that if you had called you wouldn't have gotten much action later probably...
|
|
#15
10-23-2005, 12:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hello,Beer! FOLD! If u had him beat at this stage,
No, if Bart doesn't have trips, then Beer would be making a big FTOP mistake by folding. If Bart has trips, Beer is about a 3:1 dog. If Bart has only two pair, however, Beer is a 3:1 favorite. If Bart started with a three-flush or AKQ or something, Beer is an even bigger favorite. I suspect that Bart's range of raising hands is sufficiently broad that Beer needs to call down.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
