Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171  
Old 11-02-2005, 08:19 PM
belloc belloc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: \"Official\" ESPN Coverage of WSOP Main Event: 11/1

[ QUOTE ]
Josh, hitting 13,000 posts?

Do you ever atually play poker?

Anybody else even on the posting leaderboard with you?

--Zetack

[/ QUOTE ]

Jakethebake has almost 20k, and I'm pretty sure no one thought he even *played* poker until he started a thread in one of the poker related forums last week.
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 11-02-2005, 08:42 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,044
Default Re: \"Official\" ESPN Coverage of WSOP Main Event: 11/1

Just in case there was any doubt, I've been able to verify that "tiffany" is indeed Tiffany Williamson. It is not a gimmick account.
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 11-03-2005, 01:22 AM
belloc belloc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: \"Official\" ESPN Coverage of WSOP Main Event: 11/1

[ QUOTE ]
Just in case there was any doubt, I've been able to verify that "tiffany" is indeed Tiffany Williamson. It is not a gimmick account.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd have been shocked if it weren't; her posts seemed too genuine. I'm glad she decided to weigh in here because it certainly changed my opinion of her, which (I'm sorry to admit) I allowed to be formed by the ESPN coverage.

I wish her all the best in improving her poker game, and in rising above all the criticism that's going to be headed her way for a long time.
Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old 11-03-2005, 01:34 AM
cwsiggy cwsiggy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 348
Default Re: \"Official\" ESPN Coverage of WSOP Main Event: 11/1

There was no reason whatsoever to ask the dealer to count out Raymer's stack when he said "1.3 exactly" I know it is her right to ask for a chip count, but she must have known that she was basically all in - 100k either way wouldn't have made any difference in the decision. That was almost worse than her other stalls.
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old 11-03-2005, 01:36 AM
Benoit Benoit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 74
Default Re: \"Official\" ESPN Coverage of WSOP Main Event: 11/1

[ QUOTE ]
There was no reason whatsoever to ask the dealer to count out Raymer's stack when he said "1.3 exactly" I know it is her right to ask for a chip count, but she must have known that she was basically all in - 100k either way wouldn't have made any difference in the decision. That was almost worse than her other stalls.

[/ QUOTE ]

She had him covered and doubled him up when he won.
Reply With Quote
  #176  
Old 11-03-2005, 01:54 AM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 307
Default Re: \"Official\" ESPN Coverage of WSOP Main Event: 11/1

Hi Kev,

[ QUOTE ]
We've got quite a battle so far for biggest douche of the WSOP: Stillman, Friedman or Dannenman.

[/ QUOTE ]

I played a couple of different times against Stillman in AC recently, and found him to be a very fun and good-natured guy. His behavior on TV was pretty bad in a few spots, but the only one I really have a problem with is the way he went off on the obvious fish who busted him. When they play that bad, it's time to smile at them and shake their hand--especially when they are good people.

I have to admit, though, watching the folks in the final 50 or whatever donk it up so intensely made me feel a lot better about busting out of the tournament where I did. I rarely encountered play as horrendous as some that I witnessed in this most recent episode, except for the very first table on day 1.

Tiffany W. seems very nice, but I just can't imagine what looked good to her about calling off everything with KJs (the stack sizes and pot sizes were hard to determine, but it looked like she was dealing with a big overbet). Elsewhere, the guy pays off Layne Flack's river raise with 66 on the J x x A x board--it would've been hilarious if Layne had been bluffing with a pair of 8s or something. I know this was in the last episode, but it was just too funny to go w/o mention.

Dannenman's all-in with a bluff-catcher (K5 on a 225 board) was pretty sweet, too.
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old 11-03-2005, 03:35 AM
Vincent Lepore Vincent Lepore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 570
Default Re: \"Official\" ESPN Coverage of WSOP Main Event: 11/1

The call on the River was his correct. He played the hand perfectly.

Vince
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.