Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-28-2005, 07:30 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2/4 KTs

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is just a ton of back & forth about a decision that can't possibily be worth that much in overall EV. Is this whole post a PF call/raise decision, or is there a hand coming?

[/ QUOTE ]
From the beginning this was a "I flopped a roayle flush, could I have extracted more from it"-thread, but jason re-posted the only interesting part of it. So no, there's nothing more coming. But according to some there's a huge differance in EV between raising and calling, I agree with you, it's only very slim.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah, thank you & my apologies. I didn't see that original thread, but re-reading the top, now I see that I missed it.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-29-2005, 01:09 PM
BigEndian BigEndian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 937
Default Re: 2/4 KTs

I call most of the time. Raising would require a reason to raise based on the seats involved.

- Jim
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-29-2005, 01:13 PM
BigEndian BigEndian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 937
Default Re: 2/4 KTs

MP1 is too early for me to consider raising here routinely. Too much can happen behind and I want encourage a nice big multiway pot to splash around in.

- Jim
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-29-2005, 03:09 PM
newhizzle newhizzle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: 2/4 KTs

readless at 2/4 id say this is a standard raise
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-29-2005, 05:13 PM
Niediam Niediam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 823
Default For those of you who say raise...

I understand your reasonings behind raising and I don't need you to repeat them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

SSH says that we should be limping KTs in MP in a tight game (note that everything on Party qualifies as a tight game under SSH's qualifications). You are saying that Miller et al are simply wrong or am I missing something here?

Edit: Just noticed that it's an 8 person game... does it change anything if the table is full?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.