#1
|
|||
|
|||
When do we Flush Math down the Toilet?
This is a topic that bugs me. And the most frustrating thing for me is I don't have a good answer.
Let me digress a little. We all know that math is important. From my college days of four semesters of math until the present math is important in all walks of life. We know that math is important in poker. If the pot's big drawing hands are profitable. If you're mathematically inclined you can figure out exactly how large the pot ought to be before putting in your chips. If you're an even deeper thinker you can take into consideration implied odds if there is a future round of betting. So what am I getting at? Let me address this in a round about way. If I'm playing in the WSOP ME day 1 and it's the first hand of the event and if six players limp and I raise with pocket Kings and one of the limpers moves all in I'll probably fold. It may not be sound mathematically, but it's the first hand of the event and the likelyhood that he has AA is too great. And secondly (LOL) that's what TJ and Tom say in their (LOL) great book. But what happens if we are half way or two thirds of the way through a big event. Let's for arguments sake say I have AA and I'm headsup against another player who we'll say is reasonable who calls my raise BTF. Let's say the flop comes Q Q T with a flush draw. We both have average chip stacks and I make a pot sized bet and he moves all in. What am I supposed to do? If we analyze this mathematically and put him on a range of hands which he will call BTF then it's probably an easy call. He may have a smaller pocket pair, a flush draw, a straight draw, or an outright bluff. I guess you can now figure where I'm heading with this. We call and of course he has triplicate Queens and we're busted from the tournament and as we're walking away our friend says, "you idiot, why did you call, it was very obvious he had three queens" and I feebly try to explain to him that mathematically my call was correct. Comments appreciated. Bruce |
|
|