|
|
|
|
#1
12-30-2005, 03:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: why \"The Producers\" sucks balls
I really didn't understand why they remade this to begin with (of course I understand money, but besides that). The original was great. It would almost be like remaking Blazzing Saddles. Just no point. I did have pretty high hopes that this would be a good rental though. I saw it on Broadway with Brokerick/Lane and it was fantastic.
|
|
#2
12-30-2005, 03:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why \"The Producers\" sucks balls
[ QUOTE ]
I did have pretty high hopes that this would be a good rental though. [/ QUOTE ] I should've waited till rental. Unfortunately my girlfriend didn't want to see King Kong tonight.
|
|
#3
12-30-2005, 03:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why \"The Producers\" sucks balls
[ QUOTE ]
Unfortunately my girlfriend didn't want to see King Kong tonight. [/ QUOTE ] I really, really want to. But it's almost 1 Jan. I shall refrain!!
|
|
#4
12-30-2005, 04:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why \"The Producers\" sucks balls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I did have pretty high hopes that this would be a good rental though. [/ QUOTE ] I should've waited till rental. Unfortunately my girlfriend didn't want to see King Kong tonight. [/ QUOTE ] I had to basically force my girlfriend to see King Kong, and she loved it. ~D
|
|
#6
12-30-2005, 04:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why \"The Producers\" sucks balls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I had to basically force my girlfriend to see King Kong, and she loved it. [/ QUOTE ] Is this a euphemism? [/ QUOTE ] Kinda. I'm about 100% bigger than her. ~D
|
|
#7
12-30-2005, 04:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why \"The Producers\" sucks balls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I had to basically force my girlfriend to see King Kong, and she loved it. [/ QUOTE ] Is this a euphemism? [/ QUOTE ] Kinda. I'm about 100% bigger than her. ~D [/ QUOTE ] You / 2 or her x 2? GoT
|
|
#8
12-30-2005, 01:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why \"The Producers\" sucks balls
[ QUOTE ]
I really didn't understand why they remade this to begin with (of course I understand money, but besides that). The original was great. It would almost be like remaking Blazzing Saddles. Just no point. I did have pretty high hopes that this would be a good rental though. I saw it on Broadway with Brokerick/Lane and it was fantastic. [/ QUOTE ] It was remade because the play do so good for over 4 years now. I saw the play before it opened on Broadway in Chicago with Lane and Mr. Jessica-Parker, it was awsome. So, retards in Hollywood that have little creativity make a play a movie. That is recipe for crap. Plays are not good movies 84% of the time. But, that is why the remade the movie. In all, remaking any movie staring Wilder is a bad idea (Charlie and the CF, Blazing Saddles, ect.). Lane and Matty do a great job live, but I don't see this translating to a good movie. It will be in the category of the remake of the In-laws, another mother that NEVER should have been redone.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
