Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-28-2005, 12:07 AM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

i was just comparing the 2 games in terms of HOURLY earn. they are close in this respect if you are a freak who can 6-8 table at 3/100. i never implied or suggested that one was better (for someone as a player) than the other.

i am done with you and this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-28-2005, 12:13 AM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 416
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
i am done with you and this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

aight me too.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-28-2005, 12:35 AM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 416
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

sry for bein a dick. beer wasn't helping. my bad.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-28-2005, 01:09 AM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

its cool. i was out of line as well.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-28-2005, 04:37 AM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
Do you think there is much difference between the 50 and 100 game BK?

[/ QUOTE ]the 1/2 is significantly tougher.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-28-2005, 07:15 AM
wuarhg wuarhg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 372
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

Sorry for causing such mess. I was comparing the 10/20 to 30/60, obviously I forgot that the thread was about 1/2 but what the heck... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-28-2005, 07:33 AM
Sykes Sykes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 231
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why not just datamine it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Haven't had a Party account. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

here: (Actual stats

Random guy
21,224 hands
VP$IP: 31.18
PFR: 19
BB/100: 2.90
Sessions: 126 (seems like he's playing short-handed alot)
Winnings: $120K+

This guy is the biggest winner on my datamine of 100/200.
There are people with winrates of 5-6 BB/100 over 6-8K hands though, so yes 1BB/100 is quite possible.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-28-2005, 09:23 AM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why not just datamine it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Haven't had a Party account. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

here: (Actual stats

Random guy
21,224 hands
VP$IP: 31.18
PFR: 19
BB/100: 2.90
Sessions: 126 (seems like he's playing short-handed alot)
Winnings: $120K+

This guy is the biggest winner on my datamine of 100/200.
There are people with winrates of 5-6 BB/100 over 6-8K hands though, so yes 1BB/100 is quite possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand why you think the data you have presented says anything about what win rates are quite possible.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-28-2005, 10:31 AM
stoxtrader stoxtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 219
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
its cool. i was out of line as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

awkward hugs?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-28-2005, 10:34 AM
Sykes Sykes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 231
Default Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why not just datamine it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Haven't had a Party account. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

here: (Actual stats

Random guy
21,224 hands
VP$IP: 31.18
PFR: 19
BB/100: 2.90
Sessions: 126 (seems like he's playing short-handed alot)
Winnings: $120K+

This guy is the biggest winner on my datamine of 100/200.
There are people with winrates of 5-6 BB/100 over 6-8K hands though, so yes 1BB/100 is quite possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand why you think the data you have presented says anything about what win rates are quite possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

21K hands with a 2.9BB/100 winrate seems like he is a winning player.

Here's his stats:

VP$IP From SB: 44.66
Folded SB to steal: 55.49
Fold BB to steal: 43.87
Attempt to steal blinds; 43.36
Won $ WSF% : 39.05
Went to SD%: 44.11
won $ at SD% : 51.38

AF:
Flop: 1.53
Turn: 1.32
River: 1.29

Folded to river bet: 31.89% (450/1411)
C/R: 619 times (3.15% of possible action)
Flop: 78.19
Turn: 17.29
River: 4.29
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.