Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2005, 01:59 AM
ninjia3x ninjia3x is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Default High Stakes NL to High Stakes Limit Transition

Quick question,

Is it harder for a regular High Stakes NL player become a winning high stakes limit player? or the other way around?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2005, 10:53 AM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 505
Default Re: High Stakes NL to High Stakes Limit Transition

I'm not sure there's a general answer, some people seem to take more naturally to one or the other. It also depends on the type and level of competition. But if I had to guess, I would say it's harder to avoid losing a lot of money in no limit, but harder to win consistently at limit. Therefore a good no limit player would find it harder to move to limit and keep up her win rate, than a good limit player moving to no limit. But for average or poor players it would be the opposite. An average no limit player would find it easier to break even at limit than an average limit player would moving to no limit.

Generally people get experience in both types of games before getting really good, so the conventional wisdom is no limit is harder. You can have leaks in your game that are only annoying at limit but are disastrous at no limit. But people I know who have switched later in their careers seem to find no limit easier.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2005, 09:44 AM
afreeman afreeman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 40
Default Re: High Stakes NL to High Stakes Limit Transition

I'm anything but an expert, but my sense is that the NL-->limit transition would be easier, for a couple of reasons:

First, NL places a greater emphasis on skills that can really only be learned by direct experience (e.g. hand reading, tells, etc.). Limit places a greater emphasis on recognizing and exploiting marginally profitable betting opportunities, and those skills are generally more "learnable". To put it another way, I think you could take a NL player and have him grind through 100k hands on a simulator and probably end up with a pretty good limit player. The opposite is not true.

Second, NL is inherently more complex and thus requires a deeper general understanding of poker. Selecting the correct bet size is a hugely significant part of good NL play. If you agree that both games are fundamentally similar, then you must agree that adding another significant decision factor must make NL more complex. Those that have mastered these complexities would thus possess a deeper understanding of hold'em as a whole.

Finally, maybe this is why it is possible to write a computer program that can perform acceptably well at middle limit play, while the best NL bots can only beat the lowest-level games. See www.poki-poker.com or search for research papers by Darse Billings or Aaron Davidson on Google for more details on the difficulty of trying to program good NL play.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.