Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-05-2005, 03:05 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

KneeCo,

Please continue reading astro's post to see his very good explanation re: posting of random email joke spams to OOT.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-05-2005, 03:10 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

nice work Astro, dude sucked from his inception anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-05-2005, 03:57 PM
KneeCo KneeCo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 77
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

[ QUOTE ]
KneeCo,

Please continue reading astro's post to see his very good explanation re: posting of random email joke spams to OOT.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough, it seems perfectly justified to want to discourage people from posting forwards. Just so long as we don't start locking threads just because some people think they suck, because then there wont be any threads life and I'll have to do something with my life. In other words, one would hope that the thread would have been locked for being a copy/pasted forward even if it was absolutely hilarious and/or brilliant (which would be a first for a forward, but anyway).
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:01 PM
tonypaladino tonypaladino is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: props to Stuey for fixing my avatar
Posts: 498
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

"A thread was locked for no other reason than it didn't amuse a mod?"

No one here is amused by stupid forwarded email crap
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:05 PM
craig r craig r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: san diego
Posts: 84
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

[ QUOTE ]
"A thread was locked for no other reason than it didn't amuse a mod?"

No one here is amused by stupid forwarded email crap

[/ QUOTE ]

Damn, and I was going to post "10 reasons why cats are really not the pets, but the 'owner' is."

craig
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:09 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

craig,

pls post that ASAP, it sounds very ROFL
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:12 PM
B Dids B Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sea-town!!
Posts: 326
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

I'd just like to say that if astro deleted posts based on his own taste, that would be a godod thing.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:12 PM
craig r craig r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: san diego
Posts: 84
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

[ QUOTE ]
craig,

pls post that ASAP, it sounds very ROFL

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you trying to get me banned? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] If so, I can just do it myself. It's like suicide when a mod bans himself. In fact, I think Camus, in his essay on suicide, mentions it is rational for a mod to want to ban himself sometimes.

craig
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-05-2005, 07:41 PM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

this resulted in a 'why did the mods lock the child of the 60s thread?' with no text in the body of the post by tek, which i deleted and contacted him via pm to say it was locked because it sucked.

[/ QUOTE ]

A thread was locked for no other reason than it didn't amuse a mod?

I don't mean to start a whole thing here, but seriously?

Note that I haven't seen the thread in question, though the fact that it may or may not have sucked is irrelevant to the discussion IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. There was no reason to lock the first thread. That was truly dumb.

Astro, you're a smart guy, but if you're just going to lock things pretty much on random whims, that's pointless.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-05-2005, 07:45 PM
Mason Hellmuth Mason Hellmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 164
Default Re: Paul Phillips was right

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
craig,

pls post that ASAP, it sounds very ROFL

[/ QUOTE ]
Are you trying to get me banned? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] If so, I can just do it myself. It's like suicide when a mod bans himself. In fact, I think Camus, in his essay on suicide, mentions it is rational for a mod to want to ban himself sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Speaking of which, are you going to kill yourself any time soon? I have a hundo that says you'll do it tonight.

Encouragingly yours,
Mason Hellmuth
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.