Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:49 AM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
that u can never take away - not even with a victory in a war.

[/ QUOTE ]

The North not only won, they covered the spread.

[/ QUOTE ]


like i said...the advantages and luck that made this result possible will not change how southerns feel nor will it change our traditions

[/ QUOTE ]

Well you had to change one of 'em. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:50 AM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sthief09: im kinda drunk from the nyquil
Posts: 1,562
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
They were better equipped, better armed, baracaded the south with it's navy, and had much larger army

[/ QUOTE ]
I think that is EXACTLY how they "covered the spread".
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:00 AM
Sephus Sephus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 313
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They were better equipped, better armed, baracaded the south with it's navy, and had much larger army

[/ QUOTE ]
I think that is EXACTLY how they "covered the spread".

[/ QUOTE ]

i think this is exactly how they didn't, because it made the south a huge underdog.
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:03 AM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,247
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They were better equipped, better armed, baracaded the south with it's navy, and had much larger army

[/ QUOTE ]
I think that is EXACTLY how they "covered the spread".

[/ QUOTE ]

i think this is exactly how they didn't, because it made the south a huge underdog.

[/ QUOTE ]

If they played the game again, not many would be betting on the south.

Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:05 AM
[censored] [censored] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,940
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Just to be clear, one more time, I DO NOT WANT THE CONFEDERATE FLAG TO BE BANNED, RESTRICTED, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT!

[/ QUOTE ]

I do. Not in OOT, but to have any part of a flag flying over any state capital with a confederate flag design is completely unacceptible. Not only for what that flag, rightly or wrongly, symbolizes to millions of Americans, but also because THEY LOST THE WAR. If you lose the war, you do not get to continue flying your colors. But even ignoring that, it should be pretty obviously wrong for any public institution to have any part of that flag.

[/ QUOTE ]
Clark, just to be clear, I was only talking about this forum. I agree that it shouldn't be flown in those settings for the same reasons you state. I think you'll agree that it shouldn't be restricted on this forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im in 100% agreement with all of this. clark and evan's.
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:09 AM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 109
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They were better equipped, better armed, baracaded the south with it's navy, and had much larger army

[/ QUOTE ]
I think that is EXACTLY how they "covered the spread".

[/ QUOTE ]

"Covered the spread" refers to the final score and means the north should of won far quicker than predicted (First battle of Manassas). This did not happen. Instead the war spent 4 years in overtime and the north suffered far more casualties than the south.

What you showed up with is irrelevant.

Why am I entertaining this arguement????
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:11 AM
Voltron87 Voltron87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: checkraising young children
Posts: 1,326
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They were better equipped, better armed, baracaded the south with it's navy, and had much larger army

[/ QUOTE ]
I think that is EXACTLY how they "covered the spread".

[/ QUOTE ]

"Covered the spread" refers to the final score and means the north should of won far quicker than predicted (First battle of Manassas). This did not happen. Instead the war spent 4 years in overtime and the north suffered far more casualties than the south.

What you showed up with is irrelevant.

[/ QUOTE ]

wacki-

after the first 100 posts in the thread i didnt think you could say any more stupid crap, but apparently i was wrong.

wow.
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:14 AM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 109
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

"Covered the spread" refers to the final score and means the north should of won far quicker than predicted (First battle of Manassas). This did not happen. Instead the war spent 4 years in overtime and the north suffered far more casualties than the south.

What you showed up with is irrelevant.

[/ QUOTE ]

wacki-

after the first 100 posts in the thread i didnt think you could say any more stupid crap, but apparently i was wrong.

wow.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please tell me what facts in this post are wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:15 AM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 109
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Just to be clear, one more time, I DO NOT WANT THE CONFEDERATE FLAG TO BE BANNED, RESTRICTED, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT!

[/ QUOTE ]

I do. Not in OOT, but to have any part of a flag flying over any state capital with a confederate flag design is completely unacceptible. Not only for what that flag, rightly or wrongly, symbolizes to millions of Americans, but also because THEY LOST THE WAR. If you lose the war, you do not get to continue flying your colors. But even ignoring that, it should be pretty obviously wrong for any public institution to have any part of that flag.

[/ QUOTE ]
Clark, just to be clear, I was only talking about this forum. I agree that it shouldn't be flown in those settings for the same reasons you state. I think you'll agree that it shouldn't be restricted on this forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im in 100% agreement with all of this. clark and evan's.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with this too. However, my post was about racism and symbols in context. We have been drastically sidetracked.
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:20 AM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,247
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
We have been drastically sidetracked.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd just like to post this beautiful picture of Atlanta one more time and suggest the the point of this thread is now to heckle losers from the south *cough* <font color="white"> peachy </font> *cough* who cling to the war.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.