|
|
#1
11-03-2005, 10:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
I guess it will be harder to collude as much because its limit, but I still say there aren't enough cards in the deck to make it a fair game if 2 or 3 out of six players are nexteling each other their hole cards.
I guess Im posting this first because noone else plays on UB anymore. 
|
|
#2
11-03-2005, 10:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
I guess it will be harder to collude as much because its limit, but I still say there aren't enough cards in the deck to make it a fair game if 2 or 3 out of six players are nexteling each other their hole cards. I guess Im posting this first because noone else plays on UB anymore. [/ QUOTE ] Last I looked, 15k+ players as of 9:30 PM EST
|
|
#3
11-03-2005, 11:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
what the fuk is royal holdem?
|
|
#4
11-03-2005, 11:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
Complete tard poker, how fun.
|
|
#5
11-04-2005, 12:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
I just played it for a minute. Crazy. Flop two pair like every hand. Holdem with a pinochle deck. Sorta.
|
|
#6
11-04-2005, 12:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
I just played it for a minute. Crazy. Flop two pair like every hand. Holdem with a pinochle deck. Sorta. [/ QUOTE ] A pinochle deck is double a euchre deck right? So the board could come out five aces. What the hell kind of game is that?
|
|
#7
11-04-2005, 12:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
what the fuk is royal holdem? [/ QUOTE ] I'm guessing that it's holdem with only Tens, Jacks, Queens, Kings, and Aces. If so, it can be dealt 7-handed with no burn cards. 6-handed with three burn cards. Probably a nut-peddling game like Limit Omaha High, but with a higher risk of collusion, like the original poster stated, with the smaller deck. With two players holding 20% of the deck pre-flop, and with 35% known post flop, it would be incredibly easy to do. Add in the fact that everybody gets dealt broadway, and the worst you can have on the flop is a pair and a gutshot, and the fish have no chance. 31-1 to get pocket aces in this game. Someone correct me, please, if I'm wrong about the structure of the game.
|
|
#8
11-04-2005, 12:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
Thats it
|
|
#9
11-04-2005, 12:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
Complete tard poker, how fun. [/ QUOTE ] This game rules.
|
|
#10
11-04-2005, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
If one could quickly throw together the math for ap erfect EV strategy on this one could go clean up
Looks like people are playing it $1/$2 (only 6 max). 20 card deck, A-T of each card. Every hand I've seen a winner is a full house, yet people still cap with 1 card straights, kinda sad.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
