Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 11-06-2005, 02:31 AM
FlyWf FlyWf is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

Check-folding a flopped fullhouse is a truly remarkable experience.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 11-06-2005, 02:37 AM
largeeyes largeeyes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 73
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

Why would you play KQ but not AQ?

[ QUOTE ]
Sigh, I guess I'm going to spoil the beans on how to really play this game. Pretty much, my starting hands consist of AA, KK, AK, KQ, and QQ. That's it. Suitedness has no effect as royals are so rare. It's of course a 20-card deck so your outs are like so:

After the flop:
1/15 = 1:14
2/15 = 1:7
3/15 = 1:4
4/15 = 1:2.75
5/15 = 1:2

After the turn:
1/14 = 1:13
2/14 = 6:1
3/14 = 3.7:1
4/14 = 2:5:1

Flopping a straight is an automuck in a full-table game. You are at best tied by the river. Bottom set is also pretty dangerous. Case in point:

You have JJ
flop shows KQJ
You lose to KQ and QQ (albeit unlikely) if a Q or a K comes, and even if you aren't behind them, an AK or KQ can also pick up an Ace or King on the river. Your best shot here is to have runner-runner Tens. The only hands that would beat you then are the other pocket pairs KK and QQ.

Middle set can be quite profitable if you know how to play it however. Case in point:

You have QQ, the flop shows KQT
If the board pairs the ten, you likely have the best hand unless you're up against KK. It's a very good way of getting a decent pot, and I play QQ for just this reason. If the K pairs however, you're losing to KT, KQ, and KJ and AK if they improve on the river.

Top set and top two pair is what you should shoot for. With top two pair you have 4 outs twice (provided there are no royal draws and you don't run into quads), or (4/15)+(4/14)=55% which means you're a favorite from the flop. Bet/raise/cap. Top set, likewise. Unless you run into quads or the board shows a straight, you will win.

Anywho, I know this is formatted pretty ugly, but I hope ya'll enjoy anyhow.

-Boolean

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 11-06-2005, 03:53 AM
jwesty5 jwesty5 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
This game is too easy to beat. I give it about one week before the rocks and people who know how to play it outnumber the fish 10:1.

[/ QUOTE ]

I couldn't agree with you more. The fish lose their money fast in this game. I'm up over 200BB in about four hours of play today wondering how long this can last.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 11-06-2005, 03:57 AM
jwesty5 jwesty5 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
Why would you play KQ but not AQ?

[/ QUOTE ]

He might not because the K can slip in there and give a higher full house. FWIW I think AQ is definitely a playable hand along with the others mentioned. Basically anything with a Ten or a Jack in it is unplayable for me.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 11-06-2005, 04:40 AM
wonderwes wonderwes is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 14
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

This game is odd but I am hooked on it.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 11-06-2005, 05:23 AM
gildwulf gildwulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 3/6 six-max and $20-50 SNGs
Posts: 846
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

I am dumb, I don't see Royal Holdem in the menu...where is it?

Edit: nevermind, It's in low limit
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 11-06-2005, 05:28 AM
Adam22 Adam22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

i just found it too... you guys are all playing a .50/1 game?
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 11-06-2005, 05:32 AM
gildwulf gildwulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 3/6 six-max and $20-50 SNGs
Posts: 846
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

I'm in Tuscon and Beaumont...give a brown trout if you're playing
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 11-06-2005, 07:01 AM
pokergrader pokergrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 210
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

Hmmm...

I just won a 4-way pot with AA on a QQTTK board

That has to be the most surprising showdown victory of my poker career.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 11-06-2005, 07:29 AM
2+2 wannabe 2+2 wannabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: getting pwned in challenge
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
Hmmm...

I just won a 4-way pot with AA on a QQTTK board

That has to be the most surprising showdown victory of my poker career.

[/ QUOTE ]

KJ vs. KJ vs. AK?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.