Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 11-05-2005, 07:53 AM
Losing all Losing all is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 577
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
Lost my first three hands w/ AA (!!!) Still cashed out +6 BB. LOL.

[/ QUOTE ]


The swings will be brutal in this game, but the EV is amazing at the moment. Forget the donks that don't even know what they're playing, I see many RHE salty dogs overplaying rags over and over again.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 11-05-2005, 10:46 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

I disagree about the swings. The only hands I lost any decent amount of money on were when someone had a royal flush over my aces or kings full.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 11-05-2005, 11:37 AM
popniklas popniklas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 174
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Okay... KQs should be okay to, due to its straight flush and nut flush potential, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

Umm...I hate to break it to you, but there is no straight flush, there is no nut flush, there is only a royal flush. And you are as likely to get it with KQs as you are with ATs or AQs or KJs, etc. Flush=Winner in this game because every flush is royal.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I know. Fuzzy thinking on my part. Everything I have said in this thread so far is embarrasingly stupid, so I take it back.

Having played the game a little, it seems like the good hands in this game are AA, KK, AK, QQ. AQ is okay too, KQ and AJ okay on the button and SB.

AT, KJ, JJ = Not sure, maybe just in SB or something like that

KT, QJ, QT, JT, TT = junk

Or at least something close to that. Not sure how to play against raises though.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 11-05-2005, 11:41 AM
popniklas popniklas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 174
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
Can I consider getting a Royal as my first ever Royal Flush? I thought getting my first Royal would be a lot more enjoyable?!?!

[/ QUOTE ]

You may not. I made three of them since yesterday. This game rocks. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 11-05-2005, 11:46 AM
popniklas popniklas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 174
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
I want this game on Party! We should start a petition!

[/ QUOTE ]

That would really be something... imagine 10-tabling 15/30 royal holdem or $1000 NLRHE... jesus.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 11-05-2005, 11:50 AM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: No Poker Sept-May
Posts: 822
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

This game is too easy to beat. I give it about one week before the rocks and people who know how to play it outnumber the fish 10:1.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 11-05-2005, 12:47 PM
GrannyMae GrannyMae is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,449
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I want this game on Party! We should start a petition!

[/ QUOTE ]

That would really be something... imagine 10-tabling 15/30 royal holdem or $1000 NLRHE... jesus.

[/ QUOTE ]


this will never be spread because of the collusion potential.

OTOH, i have been killing the $50 HU sNg's there for 2 days. i am 11 for 15. very soft players.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 11-05-2005, 01:12 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

[ QUOTE ]
I disagree about the swings. The only hands I lost any decent amount of money on were when someone had a royal flush over my aces or kings full.

[/ QUOTE ]

I take this back. I just lost about 22BB at one table... with a lot of preflop raising, I guess there can be swings. Still much less than a HE 6mmx table though.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 11-06-2005, 12:22 AM
gabbahh gabbahh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 35
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

After seeing how some of these ppl play, it is hard to imagine them playing LHE...
If they suc this much at RHE, they should be playing tic tac toe instead.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 11-06-2005, 02:06 AM
largeeyes largeeyes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 73
Default Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit

Flopping quads and losing really really sucks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.