Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-29-2005, 08:22 AM
Bigwig Bigwig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad

[ QUOTE ]
And so finally:

[ QUOTE ]
Depends on the range.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but I still think it's different than what most people would assume. It surprised me a bit. One hand is not necessarily better than the other.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-29-2005, 10:59 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad

[ QUOTE ]
The range includes 65s! That means 65s is better than K6o.

[/ QUOTE ]
Better at what? I'll take my K6o against your 65s heads up.

I think OP's point is that opponents' calling ranges affect the value of a hand. A point against which it seems hard to argue. (I know you weren't disagreeing with OP.)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-29-2005, 11:05 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad

[ QUOTE ]
This is more of a theoretical question. Should we assume that the better hand is the one that does best against the range that would call you?

[/ QUOTE ]
If you're pushing, this seems like the right course.
[ QUOTE ]
Or is the best hand the one that has the most preflop equity value?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure it is of much value to base pre-flop equity on a hand's value against random hands (as you've doen in the opening post.
[ QUOTE ]
I lean toward the former in all-in situations, but I'm not sure about play before then.

[/ QUOTE ]
Suited and connected hands gain value post-flop even when they have not been made. Flopping a four-flush or OESD is valuable. Holding a King and almost pairing when a Queen comes on the flop isn't quite the same.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-29-2005, 11:14 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The range includes 65s! That means 65s is better than K6o.

[/ QUOTE ]
Better at what? I'll take my K6o against your 65s heads up.


[/ QUOTE ]

That's true, but my point is that suited connectors are surprisingly good compared to high cards with low kickers against people with calling ranges that are not extremely loose. I just thought that was surprising anyway. Never mind. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-29-2005, 05:05 PM
Bigwig Bigwig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad

[ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure it is of much value to base pre-flop equity on a hand's value against random hands (as you've doen in the opening post.

[/ QUOTE ]

But until you're called, aren't all the hands you're about to face random? This reminds me of the wave/particle quantum theory experiment.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.