|
|
|
|
#1
05-21-2005, 07:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Cloutier apply?
There are plenty of better books around than Cloutier's I find it rambling and plainly contradictory. If it is valid at all it is in big buy-in comps with slow clocks and deep stacks. Harrington on hold'em is a better bet.
regards Ross 
|
|
#2
05-21-2005, 11:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does Cloutier apply?
[ QUOTE ]
If it is valid at all it is in big buy-in comps with slow clocks and deep stacks. Harrington on hold'em is a better bet. [/ QUOTE ] That's why I'd like to see advice for lower buy-in faster round structures that are the only thing available to some players locally. Like T700 for $45, 20 minute rounds starting at 10/15.
|
|
#3
05-21-2005, 02:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does Cloutier apply?
[ QUOTE ]
If it is valid at all it is in big buy-in comps with slow clocks and deep stacks. if your name is T.J., know most of the players and are weak tight. [/ QUOTE ] fixed your post. Regards, Woodguy
|
|
#4
05-21-2005, 03:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does Cloutier apply?
Why do you insist on disrespecting 'The bible of tournament poker'?
It even has the cutest picture of Tom McEvoy holding up a little dog like Paris Hilton on the back. That is worth 25$ right there. The best part of the book that I remember is soemthing about how TJ played 72 "at the right time". The right time being when he flopped a full house. Pure genius. That being said, TJ has to be 55-60, who else thinks he would kick my ass in a street fight?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
