#1
|
|||
|
|||
My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
Well, I'm going to log the next 100 times i get HU for the title in a $200 SNG, logging my entering chipstack and my result W or L, then compare total chipstack equity to my win %. If don't like my results from that, then the NEXT 100, I'm lgging the same info, yet pushing EVERY SINGLE HAND,(not necessarily CALLING though...), then comparing the 2.
I think I have a good HU game, but the fact is that I place about 1% more total than I win (11.1% win, 12.3% place), and after about 2500 tourneys, I think i'm starting to approach statistical relevance here. Anyways, I'll post my results nightly. I'm thinking the first 100 will take a month or so,(gonna be away on vacation for 2 weeks late Dec.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
THANK YOU.
I've always wanted to try this and am very interested in seeing the results. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
I'll post an early prediction:
1. Your push strategy will be at least as good as your standard strategy. 2. Push strategy will not be more than 15% better than your standard strategy. (meaning 15% of your standard result + your standard result... not 11.1% + 15%.) The only problem is that a power analysis of the data would show that you need more samples than you have the patience to collect in order for the results to be significant. Irieguy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
[ QUOTE ]
I'll post an early prediction: 1. Your push strategy will be at least as good as your standard strategy. 2. Push strategy will not be more than 15% better than your standard strategy. (meaning 15% of your standard result + your standard result... not 11.1% + 15%.) The only problem is that a power analysis of the data would show that you need more samples than you have the patience to collect in order for the results to be significant. Irieguy [/ QUOTE ] #1 Possible. Especially when time is factored in, this may become my new permanent strategy. #2 Also possible. Yeah, i know this won't tell a hell of a lot, but it's something I'd like some basis of thought on. Although I also think my previous results are/were more due to starting at a lower chipstack on average. I'm guessing if I start ~T100 lower Heads up, that could directly account for the difference mathematically, (EASTY!) MAN do I wish pokertracker could be tweaked for this kinda stuff. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I'm going to log the next 100 times i get HU for the title in a $200 SNG, logging my entering chipstack and my result W or L, then compare total chipstack equity to my win %. If don't like my results from that, then the NEXT 100, I'm lgging the same info, yet pushing EVERY SINGLE HAND,(not necessarily CALLING though...), then comparing the 2. I think I have a good HU game, but the fact is that I place about 1% more total than I win (11.1% win, 12.3% place), and after about 2500 tourneys, I think i'm starting to approach statistical relevance here. Anyways, I'll post my results nightly. I'm thinking the first 100 will take a month or so,(gonna be away on vacation for 2 weeks late Dec.) [/ QUOTE ] I would guess that your win/place split may have a lot more to do with your 3-way play than it does your HU play. Just a thought. eastbay |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
Night 1 results.
7 HU matches. 29921 total beginning chips 4-3 record. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
Daliman,
I have a program that does this, and HU is a simplified version of my analysis. And my emperical studies of several hundreds HHs shows that you need 300-400 HH to have some statistically meanningful results for ROI around 20-40%. Since ROI for 200 is generally believed to be smaller, I would guess you need 800+ games or 200+ HU unless you are extremely good at HU. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Just some random thoughts. The results would be interesting. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
I used your program before, I'm pretty sure, and it doesn't seem like it did what I am doing,(unless a different program...). Didn't it measure your "luck" of hot/cold runs of hands?
But yes, I know it's not going to be too statistically significant. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
[ QUOTE ]
I used your program before, I'm pretty sure, and it doesn't seem like it did what I am doing,(unless a different program...). Didn't it measure your "luck" of hot/cold runs of hands? [/ QUOTE ] My program is not so easy to use and it's still sitting on my computer unless someone hacked it. Are you talking about a different thing? [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My HeadsUp for the title experiment.
I guess so, i DL'd a prog recently, thought mebbe it was one you posted.
Please disregard my reply.... |
|
|