#1
|
|||
|
|||
Your definition of a \"Tight\" vs \"Loose\" game
Sklansky in SSH makes the distinction of "Tight" games as those with 3-5 players average on teh flop, vs "Loose" games with 6-8 on average.
At 2/4 Limit, I have yet to encounter a loose game under those defintions. Specifically, it's rare to consistently see 6-8 callers, and I therefore find these definitions not applicable to changing my play preflop. However, using Pokertracker and Gametime, I certainly have identified looser games in terms of statistical critieria, most readily VP$IP. I usually identify a looser game as one with VP$IP > 20%, and anything above 30% is a goldmine. My question is, how do others define a "loose" vs "tight" table using Pokertracker/GameTime statistics, rather than simply how many callers there are? And should one therefore change starting hand play accordingly using the Sklansky model? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Your definition of a \"Tight\" vs \"Loose\" game
It depends on the level.
When I played .5/1 I thought a tight game was below 35%VPIP. At 5/10 I think anything around 28-30% is wonderful. Also as you move up the levels you pay less attention to the table as a whole and more to specific players and their position relative to you. For instance I have played in 5/10 games that were pretty good but the VPIP was only 24%. However I had position on a bad player to my immediate right. By that same token I have left games with a 37% VPIP because I was sandwhiched between maniacs and had no ability to control the action. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Your definition of a \"Tight\" vs \"Loose\" game
All of these points are very important to table selection I think. I am just starting to realize this. I used to sit around waiting for the best vpip. Now I just find a buddy and have a seat. I still gather stats on tables other buddies are at, looking for a prime one, but vpip is not all there is. Last night I played a table that was about a 20. One guy was a 67 and another was a thiry, and everyone else loved to fold constantly. That said, it was a very good situation for me.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Your definition of a \"Tight\" vs \"Loose\" game
Second the information prior. I look for tables with at least 2, preferably 3, players with a VPIP above 40%
I have yet to play in a 2/4 pp game that i thought fit SSHE loose definition that lasted more than an hour. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Your definition of a \"Tight\" vs \"Loose\" game
[ QUOTE ]
However I had position on a bad player to my immediate right. [/ QUOTE ] Within reasonable limits, more important than table VPIP. |
|
|