|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: BB/100 | |||
| <0 |
   
|
6 | 16.67% |
| 0-1 |
  
|
5 | 13.89% |
| 1-2 |
  
|
6 | 16.67% |
| 2-3 |
  
|
4 | 11.11% |
| 3-4 |
  
|
5 | 13.89% |
| Over 4.. |
  
|
10 | 27.78% |
| Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
04-14-2005, 11:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
\'Grunching\' by another name
Vote for your favorite:
|
|
#3
04-14-2005, 11:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \'Grunching\' by another name
Why would it need a name anyway?
I think all posts should be made without looking at other replies first. And if you for some reason read some replies before replying, you should reply to the reply with a "I agree" or "I disagree" and perhaps some additional commentary. Of course I don't mean you would have to use the exact words "I agree" or "I disagree" but I think you all understood that. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#9
04-14-2005, 11:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \'Grunching\' by another name
I was the guy that bitched about it in Grunch's Challenge follow-up post, but I really don't want to be responsible for raining on Grunchcan's parade.
Perhaps I was wrong in my original post and "grunching" would be appropriate? I mean, Clarkmeister did get a theorum. The only problem I can see is that if Grunchcan is going to end up in the annals of micro history, to be fair guys like Entity, BTSpider, and Shillx (etc..) would deserve an honor like this too.
|
|
#10
04-15-2005, 12:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \'Grunching\' by another name
I hear you, and I certainly want him to get props for all the advice and help he gives, but Grunch has also come out against using the term.
I for one intend on using the prelude: [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img](In the dark) and eventually shortening it to just: [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. But that's just me planning for future laziness... [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
