Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-21-2005, 10:20 PM
dumb ox dumb ox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: virginia
Posts: 34
Default dubious play

No reads.


Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. Hero posts a blind of $5.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises</font>, Hero (poster) calls, Button calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>.

Flop: (7.40 SB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">MP bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button 3-bets</font>, MP calls, Hero calls.

Turn: (8.20 BB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
MP checks, Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises</font>, Hero folds, Button folds.

Final Pot: 11.20 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-21-2005, 10:44 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: dubious play

I don't mind it that much because Button / MP may go on to cap this street. If you were closing the action I think it would suck a lot considering the implied odds we get when we hit the Jack. MP is playing somewhat like TJ however, so if we hit one of those 3 outs, we get paid.

True
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-22-2005, 01:45 AM
imported_leader imported_leader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 510
Default Re: dubious play

I don't like every street. CO posting is [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] IMO but whatever. I'd call the flop. I'm not folding the turn either you're J outs are to the nuts and only out of you're opponents could realistically have JT.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-22-2005, 03:34 AM
Buckmulligan Buckmulligan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: dubious play

There's no point raising this flop. Having the second villain pad this works favorably for our straight outs, and we probably don't have the best hand or any fold equity. Just peel.

I think the turn would be alittle more intersting in a slightly smaller pot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2005, 03:41 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: dubious play

if you're going to post in the CO, you have to be willing to 3-bet hands like this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-22-2005, 03:42 AM
Buckmulligan Buckmulligan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: dubious play

When people play aggressively preflop from CO (i.e. open raising nearly any hand), posting from there is not that bad.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-22-2005, 03:46 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: dubious play

I don't like the post. I'd be inclined to 3-bet preflop. Folding the turn is pretty bad.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-22-2005, 03:46 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: dubious play

i agree that it's better than playing passively after posting, but i still wouldn't do it because any decent player will suspect you're raising light.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-22-2005, 02:41 PM
dumb ox dumb ox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: virginia
Posts: 34
Default Re: dubious play

The general consensus is the fold was a bad move. Maybe someone can help me figure out why. I have 3 clean outs, the jack of diamonds, and 4 6s. So say about 6 outs total, which is generous. That's 6.7:1 against hitting an out on the river. The pot's giving around 5.5:1. Does implied odds tip the decision that far?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-22-2005, 02:54 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: dubious play

[ QUOTE ]
The general consensus is the fold was a bad move. Maybe someone can help me figure out why. I have 3 clean outs, the jack of diamonds, and 4 6s. So say about 6 outs total, which is generous. That's 6.7:1 against hitting an out on the river. The pot's giving around 5.5:1. Does implied odds tip the decision that far?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with folding, may get capped so then its only 2.75:1. The implied odds can make up for it, because when you hit that straight you are making the top straight and will get lots of bets from straights you beat.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.