Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2005, 02:47 AM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default 88 hand - $55

UTG 1875
MP 1520
Button 3770
Hero 1665
BB 1170

Blinds 100/200

Preflop: Hero is dealt 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
2 folds, button raises to t620, <font color="red"> Your Move </font>

All I know of villain is that he plays in higher buyin games as well. I assume he knows to be aggro late. I think his hand range here is pretty decently wide, but not below 50% of hands. But because he plays in higher buyin games, I didn't know if he could fold to 2.5:1 pot odds. Thoughts?

Is there a way to plug this into SGA?

Rest of table. MP can be dangerous. Stupid dangerous. Otherwise, it's been a pretty tight table. And my image, if anyone is paying attention, has been very tight so far.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2005, 02:49 AM
splashpot splashpot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Needham, MA
Posts: 425
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

I think I fold this. I don't see him folding especially since his stack can survive a hit.

Edit: Or dare I say, stop and go?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2005, 03:26 AM
ChrisV ChrisV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 339
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

This is a monstrous push. If he's never folding, why not push to start with? So I think you do have fold equity here. Quite apart from that, you have an exceptional hand. You understand this hand only loses to 6 hands, right? It beats the other 162, and destroys smaller pairs and Ax etc.

Hell, I'd call even if he'd raised allin. We aren't on the bubble yet, so I don't need to be ultragapping. I'd rather become big stack and then own the table on the bubble.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2005, 03:31 AM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

[ QUOTE ]

Hell, I'd call even if he'd raised allin. We aren't on the bubble yet, so I don't need to be ultragapping. I'd rather become big stack and then own the table on the bubble.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think I've come to appreciate this, nor consider this yet. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2005, 04:27 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

I'd probably push.

No, forget that. I'd definitely push. Have just noticed it's from the Button and a blatant steal attempt.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2005, 06:46 PM
Kristian Kristian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 157
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

You have a great hand, folding is horrible, calling is worse. That leaves pushing. Even if he will call with any raising hand you are in great shape to double.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2005, 06:52 PM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

[ QUOTE ]
You have a great hand, folding is horrible, calling is worse. That leaves pushing. Even if he will call with any raising hand you are in great shape to double.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL. For your benefit.

Is there any reason why you think folding might be good? And yes, calling is the worst.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2005, 06:54 PM
valenzuela valenzuela is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 453
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

Its like he bet the perfect amount..600, just enough for him to fold, oh boy, oh boy.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-28-2005, 06:58 PM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

[ QUOTE ]
Its like he bet the perfect amount..600, just enough for him to fold, oh boy, oh boy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, again completely incorrect. Did you read the OP? An amount smaller would be more perfect. I would prefer he bet 480 here (for psychological reasons, not pot odds).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2005, 07:01 PM
valenzuela valenzuela is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 453
Default Re: 88 hand - $55

His bet tells me he doesnt know how to manipulate pot size, thereby he may not be very goods with pot odds either.
edit: Actaully i might be wrong, he doesnt care about manipulating pot size anyway since he is the biggie.
Btw the perfect amount is 0. I declare myself not good enough to know what to do here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.