|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: your verdict: | |||
| Donkeys alwasy draw! You..... donkey! |
   
|
14 | 66.67% |
| I would have played it the same way given all the conditions you mentioned |
  
|
7 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
12-11-2005, 01:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Debra Lafave
Not her. Her head is too small and the skin color is a little off.
|
|
#5
12-11-2005, 01:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Debra Lafave
[ QUOTE ]
perfectly average. meaning, I'd hit, but I wouldn't work for it. [/ QUOTE ] This gives me an idea for a new point scale. 1. Would never hit it 2. Would have to be drunk 3. Would hit it, but wouldn't work for it. 4. Would saw off my left arm with a rusty knife to hit it. On Tony's 4 point scale, she is a solid 3
|
|
#6
12-11-2005, 04:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Debra Lafave
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] perfectly average. meaning, I'd hit, but I wouldn't work for it. [/ QUOTE ] This gives me an idea for a new point scale. 1. Would never hit it 2. Would have to be drunk 3. Would hit it, but wouldn't work for it. 4. Would saw off my left arm with a rusty knife to hit it. On Tony's 4 point scale, she is a solid 3 [/ QUOTE ] I think this is awesome, and a worthy improvment on the 3 point scale. In the future all my grading will be done on the "Tony's 4 point scale" I also give her a 3
|
|
#7
12-11-2005, 04:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Debra Lafave
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] perfectly average. meaning, I'd hit, but I wouldn't work for it. [/ QUOTE ] This gives me an idea for a new point scale. 1. Would never hit it 2. Would have to be drunk 3. Would hit it, but wouldn't work for it. 4. Would saw off my left arm with a rusty knife to hit it. On Tony's 4 point scale, she is a solid 3 [/ QUOTE ] Is 2 always less than 3? If so i support this scale. I'm asking you guys.
|
|
#8
12-11-2005, 04:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Debra Lafave
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] perfectly average. meaning, I'd hit, but I wouldn't work for it. [/ QUOTE ] This gives me an idea for a new point scale. 1. Would never hit it 2. Would have to be drunk 3. Would hit it, but wouldn't work for it. 4. Would saw off my left arm with a rusty knife to hit it. On Tony's 4 point scale, she is a solid 3 [/ QUOTE ] Is 2 always less than 3? If so i support this scale. I'm asking you guys. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, you have to think sober...if you are drunk and theres some chick youd bang but wouldnt work for it, that doesnt make her a 3, that just means you are drunk and shes a 2.
|
|
#9
12-11-2005, 11:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Debra Lafave
Tony's 4 point scale is fantastic
Maybe you could add something between 3 and 4 along the lines of putting in a little effort. ie: "Would miss watching the game to hit it" but not quite "Would catch a chick-flick to hit it"
|
|
#10
12-11-2005, 11:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Debra Lafave
Your scale is definitely more accurate considering OOT standards, but how come I don't see people using the "how many beers" system? I find this is much more accurate in truly describing how hot a woman is:
"She's a sixer" "Dayum, I'd have to be pretty [censored] up, probably a 12 pack and a couple of shots" "Sober" "Comatose"
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
