Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)

[GrannyMae]

Still, Party is much larger if you are talking about mid-high limit games, though if Stars gradually starts to surpass Party and it becomes accepted, that will change too.


this will never happen.

do you see why?
<font color="white">RB </font>

[teddyFBI]

Perhaps if you let affiliates share in their players' MGR, we might have a little more incentive to send new players your way...

[Sniper]

[ QUOTE ]
Awhile back, I claimed that Stars would be the undisputed bigger site by the end of January. Quite a few disagreed if I remember correctly.

[/ QUOTE ]

Party holds 50% Market Share... I would be surprised if Stars was even up to 7%.

[roundest]

[ QUOTE ]
Awhile back, I claimed that Stars would be the undisputed bigger site by the end of January. Quite a few disagreed if I remember correctly.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's because it won't happen. Take away the play money players and the micro-limits and I doubt Stars has half of the traffic that Party does.

I just took a rough count of curiosity.

Currently on Stars:

7,616 active tables
~3500 play money ring games
~1400 play money sng's and a lot of them are 2-5 table sng's
~450 micro-limits tables running

Waaaaayyyy over half the traffic there is play money.

[solucky]

from the 70K on Stars 55 K play on microlimits that Party dont offer [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. At sample PL 25 Stars NO table. Guess for NORMAL RINGGAMES stars is not bogger than Paradise pokerroom.

If party counted play money like stars does, they'd be double their numbers.

[Ro-me-ro]

[ QUOTE ]
If party counted play money like stars does, they'd be double their numbers.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was under the impression that their figures also include play money players too -- same as with us?

[mbpoker]

Party numbers do count play money. Just Stars has more of them.