|
|
#22
10-28-2005, 04:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KK
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyone like checkraising the flop? [/ QUOTE ] Still gonna be offering 10:1. I'd probably bet-3bet for simplicity's sake. Rob [/ QUOTE ] But these players are described as tight/passive, so checkraising gives them the opportunity to make incorrect folds. Getting 10:1, they might have odds to call, but psychologically they will see they have to call 2 cold and maybe more since the action isn't finished. 
|
|
#24
10-28-2005, 06:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK
[ QUOTE ]
MP3 - had QQ (a bit weak imo) [/ QUOTE ] Not weak at all, standard HPFAP play...
|
|
#25
10-28-2005, 10:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK
MP1's preflop cap suggests that he has Aces. I would lead out on the flop to see where I am. If I get a lot of resistance, I might check/call down depending on what falls on the turn and river.
|
|
#27
10-28-2005, 11:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyone like checkraising the flop? [/ QUOTE ] Still gonna be offering 10:1. I'd probably bet-3bet for simplicity's sake. Rob [/ QUOTE ] You'll get raised by AA/KK/QQ/JJ. You'll rarely get 4-bet by QQ, and JJ/AA will sometimes call the 3-bet to punish you on the turn. I don't much like 4-bets going in on this flop.
|
|
#30
10-28-2005, 01:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK
I like the checkraise w/ KK and QQ because if we lead out limpers are likely calling a single bet. I much prefer to have to opportunity to face them w/ two. Since we aren't the capper in this hand we should be able to do this near 100% of the time.
Of course since Aces we aren't worried about the overs falling we can just lead. But I wonder if check raising there occasionally isn't right also, for hand disguising reasons. HU I think this isn't a bad plan, but with the callers in between we get more value keeping them along, no? +
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
