#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 150k hand checkup
Nice.
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 150k hand checkup
um, ok.
bk |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 150k hand checkup
[ QUOTE ]
um, ok. bk [/ QUOTE ] I was refering to his kickass stats, not your post. sorry for confusion. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 150k hand checkup
it's cool.
i thought you misunderstood mine bk |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] just out of curiosity, how long did it take you to get to the point where you could 16 table? [/ QUOTE ] Is that a question for me? I don't 16 table, 10 tables is my comfort level after about one year of playing poker online. I've tried 12 and 15 tables and I don't like it. [/ QUOTE ] Hey Illunious, I ran over this thread in some other place where people pointed here to illustrate that large win rates are possibly sustainable over large hand samples. Could you repost a link to your original stats or any new ones you have? I read all this interesting discussion but the link to your stats doesn't work as it was like from november or something. Thanks in advance. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 150k hand checkup
just out of curiosity.....what kind of system would 1 use to 10 table.....I'm talking in terms of Moniter/resolution I can only manage about 4 tables effectively.....
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 150k hand checkup
tich meh lihmmit holdum
|
|
|