|
|
#1
07-25-2005, 03:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
More profitable: Sit and Go\'s or ring games? How big of a sample?
Im wondering what I'm better at SNG's or Ring. I was wondering how big of a sample I'd need. I was thinking of playing 100 $25+2 SNG's over the next couple weeks and then Im wondering how long I should play in a 2-4 room to measure. Thanks
|
|
#2
07-25-2005, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More profitable: Sit and Go\'s or ring games? How big of a sample?
Well, it doesn't really matter how many hours youplay ring games because 100 sngs isn't close to being enough.
|
|
#3
07-25-2005, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More profitable: Sit and Go\'s or ring games? How big of a sample?
[ QUOTE ]
Im wondering what I'm better at SNG's or Ring. I was wondering how big of a sample I'd need. I was thinking of playing 100 $25+2 SNG's over the next couple weeks and then Im wondering how long I should play in a 2-4 room to measure. Thanks [/ QUOTE ] Well, however long it takes you to play X amount of SNGs is probably how long you should play ring games to measure the difference.
|
|
#4
07-25-2005, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More profitable: Sit and Go\'s or ring games? How big of a sample?
zippy couldnt have said it better. Hours, not amount of sngs played. Also, if your gonna compare turbo 27s on stars to its 2-4 game, 27s are gonna be more profitable, imo. If your skill level is equal in both, that is.
|
|
#5
07-25-2005, 04:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More profitable: Sit and Go\'s or ring games? How big of a sample?
Ring is more profitable, but easier to lose money as well. I think that's a decent general statement
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
