#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: display setup...which is best for multi-tabliing???
[ QUOTE ]
Also, The Dell 2405FPW is so large that I was wondering IF you could 4 table with no overlap in a lower resolution: 1360 x 768, for example [/ QUOTE ] it doesn't matter if the monitor is 50'x50', if the resolution is 1360x768, then u can't fit 4 800x600 tables for no overlap, you need (800*2)x(600x2)=1600x1200 resolution if u find a 15" monitor that does 1600x1200, then that works just as well as a 200" monitor that does 1600x1200 u can't resize the tables, so u need the resolution |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: display setup...which is best for multi-tabliing???
the physical resolution is 1920x1200, and the best that you can work with ( for your eyes ). 1600x 1200 is the best for 4 tabling without overlap. I 6 table and see around 80% of the tables ( moving the right and left table a little bit outside the screen )
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: display setup...which is best for multi-tabliing???
None of the above.
Go with 2x Samsung SyncMaster 213t. I prefer the black ones. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: display setup...which is best for multi-tabliing???
I like 2 used 21" CRT's at about $100 per monitor.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: display setup...which is best for multi-tabliing???
[ QUOTE ]
if u find a 15" monitor that does 1600x1200, then that works just as well as a 200" monitor that does 1600x1200. [/ QUOTE ] I disagree somewhat. I have a 21" monitor capable of 2048 x 1536, but at that resolution on a 21" the text is very hard to read. At work I am using a 17" monitor with a max Res of 1280 x 1024, that would be the highest Res I would consider usable for a 17" monitor. I couldnt imagine 1600 x 1200 on a 15" monitor. Of course your mileage may vary. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: display setup...which is best for multi-tabliing???
well, u don't have to read much text for party
obviously for day to day stuff, i'd rather have my 21" monitor doing 1600x1200 than some 15/17" doing the same but for poker only, u can see the cards and buttons and chip stacks well enough especially since if that's a 15" screen, which = 17" monitor and anyway, my point was that it doesn't matter so much the size of the screen as the resolution...so many on here think that screen size dictates table #...but most projectors can't do 1600x1200, so while they can do 110" on the wall, they can't do more than 2 tables |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: display setup...which is best for multi-tabliing???
I use 1600x1200 on my 15in LCD built into my laptop. Sometimes websites have too-small text (couf, the menu here, couf) but most are completely readable.
|
|
|