Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:22 PM
wtfsvi wtfsvi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 484
Default NL$100, KQo

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (6 max, 5 handed) converter

<font color="#C00000">SB ($66.55)</font>
BB ($103.25)
Hero ($101.5)
<font color="#C00000">MP ($428.09)</font>
<font color="#C00000">Button ($80.72)</font>

Preflop: Hero is UTG with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.5.
Hero calls $1, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises to $4</font>, Button calls $4, SB (poster) calls $3.50, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero folds.

I have a little less than 100 hands on MP. Raises about 10% of hands preflop, is aggressive postflop.

Limp fine, fold fine?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:28 PM
orange orange is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

I think it's fine. Your OOP with a marginal hand. Folding is good imo.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:32 PM
FreakDaddy FreakDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 651
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

Limping here totally depends on the table. What's the table PFR%? If it's above 6 then I don't limp with this hand UTG. The fold is fine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:32 PM
BBD BBD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 45
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

I would have raised UTG with the K-Qo. Folding to MP's raise was probably a smart play, but with the button and SB both calling there might have been enough action to call here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:37 PM
wtfsvi wtfsvi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 484
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

Table contains 2 loose passives, 2 loose aggressives (including MP) and one rock. Table pfr is 7%; I find that (very) low for NL$100 6max.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:48 PM
FreakDaddy FreakDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 651
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

[ QUOTE ]
Table contains 2 loose passives, 2 loose aggressives (including MP) and one rock. Table pfr is 7%; I find that (very) low for NL$100 6max.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ahh, missed the 6 max in the hand. I've played little 6 max but you're right, 7% would be low. I don't really know what a proper adjustment number would be here. Raising every once in awehile isn't out of the question either. My basic point though is that if it's fairly low, then limping with these marginal hands is OK, but if it's high then you're just spewing chips.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:55 PM
wtfsvi wtfsvi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 484
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar på:</font><hr />
I would have raised UTG with the K-Qo. Folding to MP's raise was probably a smart play, but with the button and SB both calling there might have been enough action to call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would be more ready to call if I'm heads up actually. Cut's down on the reverse implied odds. (I'll be embarassed if I used that phrase in the wrong context just now.)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2005, 06:28 PM
tripdad tripdad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: east central indiana
Posts: 291
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

limping is fine IMO. i would most certainly call, though, getting better than 4:1 for it to try to hit big and get paid off. gotta play it well after the flop, though.

ni-han!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-13-2005, 12:52 PM
snappo snappo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

I don't limp with KQo UTG, I fold it. I'm not saying that is the correct play and I'm sure there are situations where it's fine to limp with them. But you're in horrible position and it is a trap hand that can get you in a lot of trouble unless you have stellar postflop skills.

So I'd say the limp is questionable. The fold to the raise is definitely fine.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-13-2005, 03:46 PM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: NL$100, KQo

If this were 9-handed or 10-handed, KQo UTG would be a marginal hand. Sometimes I limp with it, but usually I fold.

Since it is 5-handed, you start in MP3. KQo is worth a raise.

Given that you limped and there was a raise and a call behind you and then the SB called, you should be very worried that you are dominated, and folding is fine.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.