Party Support is Hilarious

[2easy]

[ QUOTE ]
Link? Thousands of people have brought this up but no one has ever proved it. Do you have evidence that Party uses a deck that is shuffled until the last player acts in a round?

[/ QUOTE ]

it's not exactly "shuffled" until the last player acts in a round, but generated on demand/real time.

did you misread what was stated?

link? well no, i'm not going to do your legwork for you to "prove" to you anything.

however, there was a clue in there as to how one could do this for themselves, if motivated enough. (where i said the part about party stating...)

and as to "evidence?" this info is not exactly a state secret. there is more than just "evidence" available. there is solid factual information readily available to those who care to put in a little effort to do a small amount research.

[BusterStacks]

[ QUOTE ]
My understanding was that Party's "deck" was constantly being shuffled inbetween cards. This answer from support suggests that the shuffling ends when the first cards are dealt. Anybody know which is right?

--Zetack

[/ QUOTE ]

It would not matter. Do you see why?

[LBJ]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Link? Thousands of people have brought this up but no one has ever proved it. Do you have evidence that Party uses a deck that is shuffled until the last player acts in a round?

[/ QUOTE ]


link? well no, i'm not going to do your legwork for you to "prove" to you anything.

however, there was a clue in there as to how one could do this for themselves, if motivated enough. (where i said the part about party stating...)



[/ QUOTE ]

My legwork? This was your statement!!

If you state something, and proclaim it as true, you should be able to prove it. The fact is, maybe people say Party uses the type of RNG you describe but it has not been proven to me and I've done a lot of reading on this. Should you just be able to walk around and proclaim anything you want without proof? No. Do your own "legwork", this is your claim.

[2easy]

from buster:

"it would not matter."

and this too is very true.

peace,

2easy

[2easy]

[ QUOTE ]
The fact is, maybe people say Party uses the type of RNG you describe but it has not been proven to ME and I've done a lot of...

[/ QUOTE ]

the word ME is key here.

i already have done my own legwork, and that is why i know.

obviously you haven't done enough, cause you don't know one way or the other.

news flash! i have a life, and i allocate my time to the things that are important to me.

re-researching something that i have already done, for your approval, doesn't come close to attaining that status.

as i said, this isn't state secrets we're dealing with here.

it can be found on party's website.

the tools are there to inform yourself.

if you want to, do it.

if not, that's your perogative as well.

give a man a fish you feed him for a day...teach a man to fish you feed him for a lifetime.

[SoftcoreRevolt]

Party's customer service has been improving a lot lately, but any response from them still includes the word "Kindly" 100 times.

I think someone needs to ask them the important question someone posed to Stars, who would win in a fight, Darth Vader or the Terminator.

And could the winner hack their RNG.

And if Robocop killed them both, could he just stick his little stabby wrist knife thing into a computer and hack Party Poker.

[Stellastarr]

Thats hilarious!

[PITTM]

you made that up right? theres no way they would actually respond, haha

rj

[langley11]

crazy

[Tooork]

well well!