Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-17-2005, 12:14 AM
PollyEmory PollyEmory is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 60
Default Re: Two Guardian Articles on Party Poker

If they are in danger of getting arrested in the US, how did they get on the cruise in SD? I bet they needed to apply for visas, no?

--Polly
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-19-2005, 12:36 PM
Exsubmariner Exsubmariner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Now Declassified
Posts: 71
Default Re: Two Guardian Articles on Party Poker

This could make for an interesting legal battle. Possibly going all the way to the supreme court. It could result in legalization and taxation of internet gaming companies inside the borders of the US, ultimately. I am looking forward to it. I bet that the porn princess hires the best lawyers in the country and pays them truckloads of cash to fight it. There is just too much money at stake here and the feds have fired their warning shot. Wait for Party Gaming to shoot back.
X
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-19-2005, 01:18 PM
jrbick jrbick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 129
Default Re: Two Guardian Articles on Party Poker

I want to know more about how the USDOJ works in light of case-law, etc. Do people consider Online Gambling a "grey" area simply because there is inconsistancy w/in our own Justice System as to the relevancy of existing laws? How do the WTO's recent rulings effect the USDOJ's perspective on the issue and obviously how they will respond in the future?

Does this topic need to be carried over to another forum or is it still kosher (topic being "The USDOJ and the Legality of Online Gambling in the U.S.")?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-19-2005, 06:13 PM
CORed CORed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 273
Default Re: Two Guardian Articles on Party Poker

I've often wondered what Dikshit wrote Party's software.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-20-2005, 10:28 AM
Robby Box Robby Box is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 27
Default Re: Two Guardian Articles on Party Poker

Surely running a sportsbook is totally different legally to merely facilitating the rendezvous of various poker players around virtual tables for a modest fee [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-20-2005, 11:56 AM
Aetherish Aetherish is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5
Default Re: Two Guardian Articles on Party Poker

[ QUOTE ]
Surely running a sportsbook is totally different legally to merely facilitating the rendezvous of various poker players around virtual tables for a modest fee [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Not in most states in the USA. Poker is treated like any other form of gambling. There are some interesting cases (CA and WA) but even these are highly regulated.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-20-2005, 12:03 PM
meow_meow meow_meow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 180
Default Re: Two Guardian Articles on Party Poker

[ QUOTE ]
http://www.freejaycohen.com/

http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/cohen.htm

Isn't this an entirely different ordeal since sportsbetting is ENTIRELY illegal in the US? His Sportsbook hosted wagering from U.S. citizens for U.S. sports teams... so it makes sense that the USDOJ would use the Wire Act as support in such a case, however, I can't see where justice is served when our Gov. has done nothing to regulate American's internet use so far. It's still a GLOBAL forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

If this is true, how do you explain Vegas?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.