Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2005, 09:36 PM
CD56 CD56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 114
Default Re: Matt Hilger\'s WSOP proposal

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The top players would be happy, as they now would have a prestigious tournament to play that would crown their champion.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are there really that many top pro's complaining about the ME? Also what would prevent the average player from forking over the cash...

[/ QUOTE ]

probably the fact that it is now 100K rather than 10K

satellites would be much longer too...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2005, 11:08 PM
Matt Williams Matt Williams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: Matt Hilger\'s WSOP proposal

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The top players would be happy, as they now would have a prestigious tournament to play that would crown their champion.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are there really that many top pro's complaining about the ME? Also what would prevent the average player from forking over the cash...

[/ QUOTE ]

probably the fact that it is now 100K rather than 10K

satellites would be much longer too...

[/ QUOTE ]

If they are going to have a buy-in over $25K, I would like to see NO satellites at all. It's PUSU time, cough up the dough or go home.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2005, 11:34 PM
SoftcoreRevolt SoftcoreRevolt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 902
Default Re: Matt Hilger\'s WSOP proposal

Why? You do realize even pros play in sats. Oh dear god think of the prestige, we can't lose prestige!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2005, 12:20 AM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: Matt Hilger\'s WSOP proposal

[ QUOTE ]
If they are going to have a buy-in over $25K, I would like to see NO satellites at all. It's PUSU time, cough up the dough or go home.

[/ QUOTE ]

How are you going to eliminate satelites?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-21-2005, 05:51 PM
fnurt fnurt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 292
Default Re: Matt Hilger\'s WSOP proposal

[ QUOTE ]
If they are going to have a buy-in over $25K, I would like to see NO satellites at all. It's PUSU time, cough up the dough or go home.

[/ QUOTE ]

You cannot stop me and my 24 friends from putting up $1000 apiece and having a satellite. By the same logic, you cannot prevent online sites from offering a satellite to your tournament. Nor can you prevent people from soliciting backers, etc.

Theoretically, the house could refrain from running "official" satellites but considering (1) the satellites increase the number of entries, thus making the house more money, and (2) the satellites themselves are raked, it's hard to imagine the sponsor that would shoot itself in the foot by trying this.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.