Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2005, 05:43 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default SNG vs MTT

I'm not too sure if this is a valid question but

Right now im playing the 22s @ about 500 tournaments.

Is there any extra value i can expect if i decide to convert to MTT? I prefer SNG to ring games due to lower variance, and have been getting a steady ROI (17%) in the 22s, so should I spend the extra effort learning MTT or honing my skills on the 22s. I ask this because I can only afford to play approx 2 hours a day max.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2005, 05:45 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: SNG vs MTT

MTTs are higher variance than SNGs and quite probably than limit games, too..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2005, 05:58 AM
Slim Pickens Slim Pickens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 786
Default Re: SNG vs MTT

My ROI at the $22 MTT's is 12,412.82%. It was only about 7% at the $22 STT's. I think multis are more profitable.

PS: My MTT sample size is 2 but I think that win rate is sustainable.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2005, 06:17 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SNG vs MTT

If your refering to the larger MTT's, then obviously a little more that 2 hours per day is needed as many go 6+ hours deep. I recently switched to plaing primarily SNG's, but I'll still play a couple MTT's per week just to mix things up or change pace.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2005, 06:24 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SNG vs MTT

The skill sets are different, but assuming you can attain an equal skill level at each, here are my guesses:

MTTs are profitable for a smaller percentage of players than STTs. For an even smaller percentage of players, then, MTTs are more profitable STTs.

MTTs have much higher variance for playres of any skill level. The difference is probably enough that anyone playing a particular buyin STT because of bankroll rather than skill would be better off playing STTs than lower buyin MTTs.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2005, 08:14 AM
lacky lacky is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: SNG vs MTT

mtt's are the longest form of poker and they are the highest varience poker, so I guess i'm missing the point of your question. if you don't already know those two things you definately should not play mtt's.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2005, 12:55 PM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: SNG vs MTT

if you can only play 2 hours of poker a day, playing mtts is totally ridiculous.

the general question of "should i play game x v game 7" should be answerable only with lots of information, none of which anyone ever puts in such posts.

c
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2005, 01:08 PM
benfranklin benfranklin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 155
Default Re: SNG vs MTT

[ QUOTE ]
if you can only play 2 hours of poker a day, playing mtts is totally ridiculous.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not if you always bust out early [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]


[ QUOTE ]
the general question of "should i play game x v game 7" should be answerable only with lots of information, none of which anyone ever puts in such posts.

[/ QUOTE ]

People who know enough to put the right information in such a question are the people who know how to figure out the answer themselves.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.