|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your risk of ruin, expressed in percentage terms? | |||
| I know my RoR exactly and I have recently made bankroll and play adjustments to reduce my RoR. |
   
|
7 | 9.33% |
| I have studied this intensely and I know my RoR exactly |
  
|
9 | 12.00% |
| I think it's around 5% for me |
  
|
6 | 8.00% |
| I know what it means but I never attempt to calculate it |
  
|
39 | 52.00% |
| I dont know the definition of this term |
  
|
14 | 18.67% |
| Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-28-2005, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Least likely to make WSOP final table again
Which final table 2005 WSOP Main Event finisher is least likely to make a final table in any WSOP event ever again?
|
|
#3
11-28-2005, 02:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Least likely to make WSOP final table again
Post Deleted as the post to which it replied was deleted. -Dids
|
|
#4
11-28-2005, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dannenmann
What are all the Dannenmann detractors basing their opinions on? Ok, he should have gotten away from his top pair against Hachem's straight, and he spewed chips to Lederer earlier on. Aside from those two incorrect reads, though, how exactly did he play badly? To me, Lazar's play was definitely more questionable (Steve wouldn't have tilted like that), and Kanter's probably was too.
|
|
#5
11-28-2005, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Least likely to make WSOP final table again
Anyone else believe that Dannenman has been playing a lot longer than he says ? No way you could play no limit hold em for 3 months and make it through that big of a field, without someone having trapped you earlier in the tournament. It's IMPOSSIBLE.
|
|
#6
11-28-2005, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Least likely to make WSOP final table again
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else believe that Dannenman has been playing a lot longer than he says ? No way you could play no limit hold em for 3 months and make it through that big of a field, without someone having trapped you earlier in the tournament. It's IMPOSSIBLE. [/ QUOTE ] The point is that it's totally NOT impossible. This is a very important fact to understand when thinking about tournament poker. Also- some people learn quick. I'd wager that Danneman was probably a much better player by the end of the WSOP than he was at the start. Can't really ask for a better crash course in poker.
|
|
#7
11-28-2005, 02:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Least likely to make WSOP final table again
this is a close call between dannenmann and kanter.
i didn't see all the coverage, but it seemed that dannenmann played pretty poorly throughout. kanter it seems only played really terribly in a couple of spots, but fossilman seemed to imply once that he was pretty bad throughout. without more info, i'd have to say dannenmann because my coin came up tails.
|
|
#8
11-28-2005, 03:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Least likely to make WSOP final table again
Citanul- based on what we saw, Dannenmann played pretty solid, Kanter was much worse (but almost all we saw of Kanter were just bad hands, so it's hard to say).
I really don't think we have enough information to make this decision and am tempted to lock this thread. What say you, unwashed masses of the WPT forum, should posts like this live or die?
|
|
#9
11-28-2005, 03:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Least likely to make WSOP final table again
I think that posts like this, posts calling people coke heads, posts about well, basically all that stupid non poker crap, should be locked pretty quick. but i took a shower today, so i don't count.
|
|
#10
11-28-2005, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Least likely to make WSOP final table again
[ QUOTE ]
I think that posts like this, posts calling people coke heads, posts about well, basically all that stupid non poker crap, should be locked pretty quick. but i took a shower today, so i don't count. [/ QUOTE ] That would be the end of this forum pretty quickly. (The pointless posts, not your shower.)
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
