|
|
#4
05-10-2005, 12:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Has the addition of 30/60 tables made the 15/30 noticeably better? [/ QUOTE ] Why would they? I think that they will have a detrimental effect on the 15 games. [/ QUOTE ] I wondered the same thing, but then thought, maybe the 15 will be softer since the toughest players will be more inclined to play the 30 now that seats are more readily available. 
|
|
#5
05-10-2005, 12:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Has the addition of 30/60 tables made the 15/30 noticeably better? [/ QUOTE ] Why would they? I think that they will have a detrimental effect on the 15 games. [/ QUOTE ]the best players want to play higher.
|
|
#7
05-10-2005, 12:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..
Also true, of course. Does this mean that tonight would be a good time for me to take my first shot at the 30? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#8
05-10-2005, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..
[ QUOTE ]
Also true, of course. Does this mean that tonight would be a good time for me to take my first shot at the 30? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I wonder if this situation will be similar to the introduction of the $1000 NL tables at Party, where the tables were really fishy for some length of time after the tables opened, and then most of the terrible players busted and the games went back to normal. If so, it would make sense to take your shot tonight...I'm thinking about doing the same.
|
|
#10
05-10-2005, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party adding more 30/60 tables..
Ugh, I rewrote that sentence and did a pretty poor job of it. I meant to ask if the addition of more tables has made the 30/60 noticeably better; at first I wrote it in terms of making the 15/30 worse, but I realized that sounded stupid.
I need sleep.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
