|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Playing on tilt, tired, and/or with a lack of confidence | |||
| > 1.0 |
   
|
14 | 46.67% |
| between 0.5 and 1.0 |
  
|
6 | 20.00% |
| between 0.25 and 0.5 |
  
|
7 | 23.33% |
| between 0.1 and 0.25 |
  
|
3 | 10.00% |
| < 0.1 BB/100 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#32
12-31-2005, 06:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The OOT Challenge
What if we did it this way?
Make a thread and people post stating which side they are on. Side one is the group that wants no posts in oot for 24 hours. Side two is the group that thinks it is a stupid idea and that it could never work. Anyone that does not post in the thread picking a side does not count in the challenge. Then the good part the rewards. If someone from group 2 posts they are IP banned and everyone in their group is banned from oot. If someone from group 1 posts they are NOT banned and everyone from their group is banned from oot. If after 24 hours neither group has made posts then group 1 is banned from oot. All participants have the option to chicken out after teams are final but only before the 24-hour challenge has started if they see a person on their team they don't trust has joined after they did. You know keep it simple. Mexican Standoff! 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode