|
|
#21
05-27-2005, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very welll known 2+2, I don\'t get it ? my 3 year old new your h
[ QUOTE ]
Haha, I'm saying that you aren't shy about floating a lot of hands and then cr-ing a lot of flops - and when I had 20 outs on the turn, making it a clear call, a river call seemed close, especially since I didn't think you'd float a small pair there. -James [/ QUOTE ] and now we see why... 'cause ya never know what i got...just keep callin [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] but seriously though, i do think i was playing a wee bit too loose in the sb overall. not no more tho' -Barron 
|
|
#22
05-27-2005, 05:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 very welll known 2+2, I don\'t get it ? my 3 year old new your h
Yeah I agree your SB call is bad, but hell you cant put a dollar amount on taking that 67 and sticking it right up James's ass. Anyhow, this thread is kinda dumb. If I have a draw and need to get the river I would pay off a lot of the time agaist a tricky player too. It probably only seems so bad because these guys might think on a different level than you. Maybe that not true, I really have no idea, but there is a lot going on in spots like this and you didnt touch on any of it. Barron might think James will call the turn, but not the river with a lot of ace high hands. James might know Barron could be assuming this, and on and on. Also its tough for James to give Barron a 6 after he smooth calls from the sb, and Barron would likely three bet a medium pair. It would also be a strange, although interesting way to play 3 jacks. Maybe they are both thinking about completely different things, who knows, its all about thier past history and how those hands have played out. Anyhow I wouldnt be so quick to critisize.
|
|
#25
05-28-2005, 12:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 very welll known 2+2, I don\'t get it ? my 3 year old new your h
[ QUOTE ]
Hey hogger, you are plainly an idiot, but even if you weren't, I would feel no need to justify my play to you. If you can't see the merits of calling down against some wacko SB call on a 6JJ board against a habitual bluffer, then I certainly won't sit here and explain them to you. If you have played so much against me, then I'm sure you have a very good record against me since even three year olds can read my hands. Good luck on the tables. -James [/ QUOTE ] Fair enough. I never said 3 year olds could read your hands. I said a 3 year old could read this hand for AQ. Thanks for the input
|
|
#26
05-28-2005, 12:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 very welll known 2+2, I don\'t get it ? my 3 year old new your h
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Hey hogger, you are plainly an idiot, but even if you weren't, I would feel no need to justify my play to you. If you can't see the merits of calling down against some wacko SB call on a 6JJ board against a habitual bluffer, then I certainly won't sit here and explain them to you. If you have played so much against me, then I'm sure you have a very good record against me since even three year olds can read my hands. Good luck on the tables. -James [/ QUOTE ] Fair enough. I never said 3 year olds could read your hands. I said a 3 year old could read this hand for AQ. Thanks for the input [/ QUOTE ] Sure, it's easy to read a hand once the hand is all over and you know which hand is best. I could easily have 22-99, AK, AT, KQ, a jack, or any number of hands by the time the action gets to the river and SB has to put a bet in. -James
|
|
#27
05-28-2005, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 very welll known 2+2, I don\'t get it ? my 3 year old new your h
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Hey hogger, you are plainly an idiot, but even if you weren't, I would feel no need to justify my play to you. If you can't see the merits of calling down against some wacko SB call on a 6JJ board against a habitual bluffer, then I certainly won't sit here and explain them to you. If you have played so much against me, then I'm sure you have a very good record against me since even three year olds can read my hands. Good luck on the tables. -James [/ QUOTE ] Fair enough. I never said 3 year olds could read your hands. I said a 3 year old could read this hand for AQ. Thanks for the input [/ QUOTE ] Sure, it's easy to read a hand once the hand is all over and you know which hand is best. I could easily have 22-99, AK, AT, KQ, a jack, or any number of hands by the time the action gets to the river and SB has to put a bet in. -James [/ QUOTE ] Yes my mistake I guess I just got lucky when I pegged your hand. If you would have shown 55 I would have been wrong and moved on with no thought but 99-77 I would have been surprised. Sorry I got in your face with the post. I was discussing this situation the other day and was argueing that Ace high is paying to much. Then this hand came up so I decided to look here for input. Thanks Mike
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
