|
|
#11
12-23-2005, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $2/4 vs. $3/6? Educate me
[ QUOTE ]
The rake at 2/4 might be impossible to beat. [/ QUOTE ] People often say that, but I think it's pretty unlikely -- particularly in the $2/4 game I know best, at Foxwoods. Now whether it's possible to beat for gas + hotel + food expenses... well, that's a different matter. 
|
|
#12
12-23-2005, 06:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $2/4 vs. $3/6? Educate me
The 3/6 games are a lot tougher than the 2/4 games. A lot more pros play in these games and you'll be lucky if you turn a profit in some of the stronger games. Stick to 2/4 or lower.
|
|
#13
12-23-2005, 08:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $2/4 vs. $3/6? Educate me
[ QUOTE ]
The 3/6 games are a lot tougher than the 2/4 games. A lot more pros play in these games and you'll be lucky if you turn a profit in some of the stronger games. Stick to 2/4 or lower. [/ QUOTE ] would you like ROFLMAO on that?
|
|
#14
12-23-2005, 08:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $2/4 vs. $3/6? Educate me
The pro part is pretty crazy. However, in my limited experience, at somewhere like the Borgata the $3/6 is tougher. Still loose, certainly, but nmuch tighter than $2/4.
If you're comparing the Foxwoods 2/4 to some room where 3/6 is the lowest, well, there's probably not much difference.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
