|
View Poll Results: Do you fold, call, or raise this hand on the flop with a raise? | |||
Call | 13 | 43.33% | |
ReRaise | 9 | 30.00% | |
Fold | 8 | 26.67% | |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
wacki, good idea in principle, but it is one which would be a horrible business move. If they charged people to use this site, traffic would go way down, advertising fees would go way down, visibility goes way down. 2p2 should get this, but charging people, come on man.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
wacki, good idea in principle, but it is one which would be a horrible business move. If they charged people to use this site, traffic would go way down, advertising fees would go way down, visibility goes way down. 2p2 should get this, but charging people, come on man. [/ QUOTE ] what about just charging for use of the improved search? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] wacki, good idea in principle, but it is one which would be a horrible business move. If they charged people to use this site, traffic would go way down, advertising fees would go way down, visibility goes way down. 2p2 should get this, but charging people, come on man. [/ QUOTE ] what about just charging for use of the improved search? [/ QUOTE ]um.....ok..... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] wacki, good idea in principle, but it is one which would be a horrible business move. If they charged people to use this site, traffic would go way down, advertising fees would go way down, visibility goes way down. 2p2 should get this, but charging people, come on man. [/ QUOTE ] what about just charging for use of the improved search? [/ QUOTE ]um.....ok..... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] What's so confusing? They could set up a more powerful search tool, and allow those of us to subscribe to it to do so. they could cover the cost of the software, and access to the site would not be restricted. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
so you are saying there should be two search engines? No offense bro, but that is just retarded.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
I think you would see people who don't pay getting the people that do to search for them. I don't like this idea. I support a fee for being able to post at all.
|
|
|