|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Return on Investment Simulations
correct me if i'm wrong, but I dont think many people have the problem of konwing something is +EV and not playing it.
I think the more common probably is defining the +EV in the first place. Do I misunderstand you? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Return on Investment Simulations
I think this whole post is an example of an academic type who don't understand poker very well (nor finance neither probably) trying to find that 'magic bullit'.
Complete waste of time. How are you ever going to properly simulate post-flop play, which is the overwhelmingly important factor. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Return on Investment Simulations
Phish, thanks for the comments.
it is bullet, and I am not that interested in post-flop. My key is starting hands here. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Return on Investment Simulations
Maybe this is not what you are looking for, but ideally I believe you want to play every hand that is not negative EV. This would include all hands that are neutral EV, because adding those hands adds value to your other hands. I think that number is around 20 VPIP in a full game, but I might be off.
|
|
|