|
View Poll Results: Ultimate Bet | |||
Unfavorable | 38 | 25.00% | |
No Opinion / Neutral / Don't Know | 39 | 25.66% | |
Favorable | 75 | 49.34% | |
Voters: 152. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
I guess after 20 years of even white boys wearing gangsta pants as big as tents all the way down at their knees, it's the femme's turn to look stupid, though. [/ QUOTE ] The real big baggy long "shorts" look stupid but I do like the fact that most shorts for men are cut a lot looser than shorts from my youth. During college I had one pair of jeans cut off so short I could have been arrested. ~ Rick |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
[Anyway, both these are cool, but where is the "big boops and a half-shirt" option? [/ QUOTE ] What's a boop?. Any relation to "donk" (which I'm just beginning to understand). ~ Rick |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
Belly button is a bit high. I don't even wear my pants that high. I honestly don't care about the rise either. It's just there are a lot of women that squeeze themselves in clothes that they shouldn't be wearing. Maybe in 10 years genetic therapy will change that but right now a lot of women make themselves look a lot worse then they are.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
Women who are hot will look hotter in low rise jeans. [/ QUOTE ] If you are young you may have never seen a woman with an incredible heart shaped rear end and thin waist wearing a great pair of skin tight designer jeans with the waist cut for the narrow part. That same woman would look good in low cut jeans but not as good. That said, low cut may work better for the hipless types. ~ Rick |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
couldn't resist |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
that was so unnecessary wacki!
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
This doesn't make sense. You can always look away from the big ones, which you would regardless of pant size. But it is much better to look at the hot ones with low cut. [/ QUOTE ] Hot ones are hot regardless, and I'm looking no matter what they wear. You don't have to pay do much convincing to get me to look at a hot girl. Fat ones just look WAY worse, and you can't avoid looking at them because they're as common as oxygen. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
i hate you. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
Hot women look way better with low rise but most women look awful in them. [/ QUOTE ] i think mid-rise probably looks best on most(?), but that wasnt' an option. however i prefer low rise on most girls that aren't me. so i voted for low. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Women who are hot will look hotter in low rise jeans. [/ QUOTE ] If you are young you may have never seen a woman with an incredible heart shaped rear end and thin waist wearing a great pair of skin tight designer jeans with the waist cut for the narrow part. That same woman would look good in low cut jeans but not as good. That said, low cut may work better for the hipless types. ~ Rick [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, the curvy ones don't need low cut to look good, but it makes the hipless ones look a lot sexier. |
|
|